Hi,
When running the workpatterns_report() function and I am getting results that do not fully make sense. In certain cases, I am returned 0 - < 3h patterns that look more like >9h patterns. Additionally, I sometimes see 0 - < 3h patterns in the >8h archetype. This tends to happy when I play around with the signals e.a. only analyze e-mails or analyze emails, IMs and meetings.
My expectations is that 0 - < 3h patterns are classified in the low activity archetype and that the >9h patterns are either classified as always on or long continuous/flexible work day.
I am using R version 4.1.1.
The arguments I passed are either:
workpatterns_report(
data,
hrvar = "Organization",
signals = c("email", "IM","Meetings"),
start_hour = "0800",
end_hour = "1700",
path = "workpatterns report v",
timestamp = TRUE)
As mentioned in other cases:
signals = c("email", "IM","unscheduled_calls","meetings")
or
signals = "email"
I noticed that the sample data only contains emails and IMs so its hard to reproduce the error as the structure is also different and the file is more complex.
See images:



Hi,
When running the workpatterns_report() function and I am getting results that do not fully make sense. In certain cases, I am returned 0 - < 3h patterns that look more like >9h patterns. Additionally, I sometimes see 0 - < 3h patterns in the >8h archetype. This tends to happy when I play around with the signals e.a. only analyze e-mails or analyze emails, IMs and meetings.
My expectations is that 0 - < 3h patterns are classified in the low activity archetype and that the >9h patterns are either classified as always on or long continuous/flexible work day.
I am using R version 4.1.1.
The arguments I passed are either:
As mentioned in other cases:
signals = c("email", "IM","unscheduled_calls","meetings")or
signals = "email"I noticed that the sample data only contains emails and IMs so its hard to reproduce the error as the structure is also different and the file is more complex.
See images: