[vcpkg-ci-boost] All triplets#28619
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.
Details
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:
scripts/test_ports/vcpkg-ci-boost/vcpkg.json
Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation
ports/mapnik/vcpkg.json
Outdated
| "homepage": "https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik", | ||
| "license": "LGPL-2.1-only", | ||
| "supports": "!(static & windows)", | ||
| "supports": "!(static & windows) & !uwp", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With this change, mapnik is n/a in x64-uwp. But vcpkg ci still pulls in boost-regex[icu], resulting in boost-regex not being buildable in x64-uwp CI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
vcpkg-ci-boost:arm64-windows should build, not cascade, according to depend-info and dry-run install. |
|
Pinging @dg0yt for response. Is work still being done for this PR? |
|
Yes, this is to be finished. |
|
The following ports request boost-mpi which transitively relies on msmpi:arm64-windows which is set to "skip" in vcpkg CI: If there is a chance for msmpi to work on arm64 (as indicated by "skip"), the the only solution is to hide the boost-mpi dependency behinde a feature, as done in other boost ports. |
|
Not every day we get to merge things from almost a year ago, thanks! |
|
There are still some quite useful PRs waiting to be finished (or accepted)... |
No description provided.