Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@TheRealNate did you get a chance to review this one? |
not-ai-yet
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2022
not-ai-yet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @jankapunkt, sorry about the delay. This is clearly a lot of work! These look good to me, feel free to merge whenever erady.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Intends to improve test coverage to such an extend, that we can safely refactor code to full ES6 without regressions
Also found and fixed additional issues:
$wherea fallback if argument is not a function, that relied on theFunctionconstructor, which is replaced now with an arrow function closureWhat remains to be done but is out of scope for this PR:
current coverage (updated on each push):