Remove api.Element.classList features that duplicate api.DOMTokenList#10128
Merged
Remove api.Element.classList features that duplicate api.DOMTokenList#10128
api.Element.classList features that duplicate api.DOMTokenList#10128Conversation
foolip
approved these changes
May 22, 2021
ddbeck
added a commit
to ddbeck/browser-compat-data
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2021
ddbeck
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR removes:
api.Element.classList.add_and_remove_multiple_argumentsapi.Element.classList.replaceapi.Element.classList.toggle_method_second_argumentThese features all describe
DOMTokenListAPIs that are already properly described by theDOMTokenListtree (though with varying names or structures). Because the data quality for theclassListfeatures is rather poor, it just creates confusion as evidenced by #9526.This PR fixes #9526.