Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

More efficiently handle no-op POSITION#16640

Merged
erikjohnston merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
erikj/discard_positions
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

More efficiently handle no-op POSITION#16640
erikjohnston merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
erikj/discard_positions

Conversation

@erikjohnston
Copy link
Member

We may receive POSITION commands where we already know that worker has advanced past that position, so there is no point in handling it.

We may receive `POSITION` commands where we already know that worker has
advanced past that position, so there is no point in handling it.
@erikjohnston erikjohnston force-pushed the erikj/discard_positions branch from ad9242c to 04f0e1d Compare November 15, 2023 16:11
@erikjohnston erikjohnston marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 16:55
@erikjohnston erikjohnston requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2023 16:55
@erikjohnston erikjohnston requested a review from clokep November 16, 2023 09:54
@erikjohnston erikjohnston merged commit 898655f into develop Nov 16, 2023
@erikjohnston erikjohnston deleted the erikj/discard_positions branch November 16, 2023 12:32
erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
erikjohnston added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants