Skip to content

Conversation

@TheComputerGuy96
Copy link
Contributor

This probably conflicts with #197 (so this will be a draft until that PR is merged)

@louis-e
Copy link
Owner

louis-e commented Jan 6, 2025

#197 is now merged, so is now ready for resolving the merge conflicts. Thanks for your contribution!

I'm not sure why this was in place
This apparently reduces build time with the same LTO performance
gain
@TheComputerGuy96 TheComputerGuy96 marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 15:52
@TheComputerGuy96
Copy link
Contributor Author

@louis-e I just unmarked this PR as a draft

@louis-e louis-e merged commit 49ead6c into louis-e:main Jan 6, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants