[clang-format] Annotate ::operator and Foo::operator correctly#164048
[clang-format] Annotate ::operator and Foo::operator correctly#164048
Conversation
This effectively reverts commit b5f6689 and fixes llvm#111011 more narrowly. Fixes llvm#160513
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format Author: owenca (owenca) ChangesThis effectively reverts commit b5f6689 and fixes #111011 more narrowly. Fixes #160513 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164048.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
index 5b784eded4601..ffbd3839e8eb7 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -3794,18 +3794,12 @@ static bool isFunctionDeclarationName(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
if (Current.is(TT_FunctionDeclarationName))
return true;
- if (!Current.Tok.getIdentifierInfo())
+ if (Current.isNoneOf(tok::identifier, tok::kw_operator))
return false;
const auto *Prev = Current.getPreviousNonComment();
assert(Prev);
- if (Prev->is(tok::coloncolon))
- Prev = Prev->Previous;
-
- if (!Prev)
- return false;
-
const auto &Previous = *Prev;
if (const auto *PrevPrev = Previous.getPreviousNonComment();
@@ -3854,6 +3848,8 @@ static bool isFunctionDeclarationName(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
// Find parentheses of parameter list.
if (Current.is(tok::kw_operator)) {
+ if (Line.startsWith(tok::kw_friend))
+ return true;
if (Previous.Tok.getIdentifierInfo() &&
Previous.isNoneOf(tok::kw_return, tok::kw_co_return)) {
return true;
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index 1152466b0179f..100251514a4bd 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -1129,6 +1129,11 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsOverloadedOperators) {
ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << Tokens;
// Not TT_FunctionDeclarationName.
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::kw_operator, TT_Unknown);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("SomeAPI::operator()();");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 9u) << Tokens;
+ // Not TT_FunctionDeclarationName.
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::kw_operator, TT_Unknown);
}
TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, OverloadedOperatorInTemplate) {
|
…164048) This effectively reverts commit b5f6689 and fixes llvm#111011 more narrowly. Fixes llvm#160513 (cherry picked from commit 3bb9d4a)
|
I believe this introduced a regression in clang-format. Prior to this commit, the following code would remain unchanged with with a space inserted in the function parameter. Could you send out a fix or revert? |
|
@PiJoules unfortunately, this has been backported to 21.1.4, but I will come up with a fix in the next few days. @HazardyKnusperkeks we may have to use the space (or the lack of) before |
Yeah ok... but at least add a fixme test. |
…y" (#164670) Reverts #164048 This led to a regression in clang-format where a space gets added in between the parameter type and `&`. For example, this ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& other) noexcept { ``` becomes ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication & other) noexcept { ```
…or correctly" (#164670) Reverts llvm/llvm-project#164048 This led to a regression in clang-format where a space gets added in between the parameter type and `&`. For example, this ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& other) noexcept { ``` becomes ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication & other) noexcept { ```
…y" (llvm#164670) Reverts llvm#164048 This led to a regression in clang-format where a space gets added in between the parameter type and `&`. For example, this ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& other) noexcept { ``` becomes ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication & other) noexcept { ```
…y" (llvm#164670) Reverts llvm#164048 This led to a regression in clang-format where a space gets added in between the parameter type and `&`. For example, this ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& other) noexcept { ``` becomes ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication & other) noexcept { ```
…y" (llvm#164670) Reverts llvm#164048 This led to a regression in clang-format where a space gets added in between the parameter type and `&`. For example, this ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& other) noexcept { ``` becomes ``` ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication& ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication::operator=(const ::test_anonymous::FunctionApplication & other) noexcept { ```
This effectively reverts commit b5f6689 and fixes #111011 more narrowly.
Fixes #160513