Skip to content

Do not reference the underspecified (and generally discouraged) BIP 69 #456

@TheBlueMatt

Description

@TheBlueMatt

Instead of saying that transactions should follow BIP 69, we should write out what that means, given BIP 69 isn't even well-specified itself (and to avoid the implied support for BIP 69, which generally is strongly discouraged for things that don't look like Lightning). See-also lightningdevkit/rust-lightning#84

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions