[Merged by Bors] - feat: port Data.SetLike.Basic#993
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - feat: port Data.SetLike.Basic#993
Conversation
Member
Please remove every |
gebner
reviewed
Dec 13, 2022
Contributor
|
After reviewing Gabriel's comments, bors d+ |
|
✌️ j-loreaux can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Contributor
Author
|
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
mathlib3 SHA: fc2ed6f838ce7c9b7c7171e58d78eaf7b438fb0e porting notes: 1. on `SetLike.exists` and `SetLike.forall`, the statement had to be massaged from `∃ x ∈ p, q ⟨x, ‹_›⟩` to `∃ (x : B) (h : x ∈ p), q ⟨x, ‹_›⟩`. Is this a bug? Answer: No, this is because `∃ x ∈ p` is now sugar for `∃ x, x ∈ p ∧ ...` instead of `∃ x, ∃ (h : x ∈ p), ...` 2. some lemmas were tagged with `@[mono]` but we don't have this attribute yet. I removed them but left porting notes with "TODO" to add them back. Co-authored-by: Moritz Doll <moritz.doll@googlemail.com>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors bot
pushed a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib3
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2022
Regenerated from the [port status wiki page](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/wiki/mathlib4-port-status). Relates to the following PRs: * `algebra.euclidean_domain.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#919 * `algebra.field.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#975 * `algebra.group.opposite`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#912 * `algebra.group.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#968 * `algebra.group.with_one.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#955 * `algebra.group_power.ring`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#979 * `algebra.hom.equiv.type_tags`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#943 * `algebra.hom.ring`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#958 * `algebra.invertible`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#930 * `algebra.order.field.canonical.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1018 * `algebra.order.field.canonical.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#985 * `algebra.order.field.inj_surj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1017 * `algebra.order.group.densely_ordered`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#956 * `algebra.order.group.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#933 * `algebra.order.group.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1026 * `algebra.order.group.with_top`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#946 * `algebra.order.hom.monoid`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#944 * `algebra.order.monoid.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#987 * `algebra.order.monoid.to_mul_bot`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1024 * `algebra.order.ring.abs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#929 * `algebra.order.ring.cone`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#935 * `algebra.order.sub.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#936 * `algebra.order.sub.with_top`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#932 * `algebra.order.with_zero`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#903 * `combinatorics.quiver.arborescence`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#997 * `combinatorics.quiver.cast`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#990 * `control.traversable.lemmas`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#948 * `data.bool.set`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#960 * `data.int.cast.field`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1016 * `data.int.cast.lemmas`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#995 * `data.int.cast.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1015 * `data.int.div`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1011 * `data.int.dvd.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#996 * `data.int.order.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#938 * `data.nat.cast.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#980 * `data.nat.cast.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1010 * `data.nat.cast.with_top`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1019 * `data.nat.gcd.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#965 * `data.nat.order.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#907 * `data.nat.order.lemmas`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#927 * `data.nat.set`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#961 * `data.nat.upto`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1020 * `data.pequiv`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1008 * `data.set.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#892 * `data.set.bool_indicator`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#988 * `data.set.image`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#949 * `data.set.n_ary`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#969 * `data.set.opposite`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#983 * `data.set.prod`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1004 * `data.set.sigma`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#982 * `data.set_like.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#993 * `data.two_pointing`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#984 * `logic.embedding.set`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#986 * `logic.equiv.embedding`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1021 * `order.directed`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#963 * `order.rel_iso.set`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#1005 * `order.well_founded`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#970 * `ring_theory.coprime.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#899 Co-authored-by: Jireh Loreaux <loreaujy@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
mathlib3 SHA: fc2ed6f838ce7c9b7c7171e58d78eaf7b438fb0e
porting notes:
SetLike.existsandSetLike.forall, the statement had to be massaged from∃ x ∈ p, q ⟨x, ‹_›⟩to∃ (x : B) (h : x ∈ p), q ⟨x, ‹_›⟩. Is this a bug? Answer: No, this is because∃ x ∈ pis now sugar for∃ x, x ∈ p ∧ ...instead of∃ x, ∃ (h : x ∈ p), ...@[mono]but we don't have this attribute yet. I removed them but left porting notes with "TODO" to add them back.