[Merged by Bors] - feat: case-specific equivalences for IsROrC#9782
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - feat: case-specific equivalences for IsROrC#9782
IsROrC#9782Conversation
Ruben-VandeVelde
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
Member
|
bors r- I messed up bors d+ |
Contributor
|
✌️ j-loreaux can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Contributor
|
Canceled. |
Co-authored-by: Anatole Dedecker <anatolededecker@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
bors merge |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2024
This adds ring isomorphisms and linear isometry equivalences between `𝕜` satisfying `IsROrC 𝕜` and `ℝ` or `ℂ` depending on whether `I = 0` or `im I = 1`. Of course, the design of `IsROrC` is meant to eliminate the need for such things most of the time, but these are helpful in the rare case one actually does need to split into the two cases in the middle of a proof.
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
IsROrCIsROrC
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds ring isomorphisms and linear isometry equivalences between
𝕜satisfyingIsROrC 𝕜andℝorℂdepending on whetherI = 0orim I = 1. Of course, the design ofIsROrCis meant to eliminate the need for such things most of the time, but these are helpful in the rare case one actually does need to split into the two cases in the middle of a proof.