Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - chore: fix aesop_cat wrapper for aesop#825

Closed
kim-em wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix_aesop_cat
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - chore: fix aesop_cat wrapper for aesop#825
kim-em wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix_aesop_cat

Conversation

@kim-em
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kim-em kim-em commented Dec 2, 2022

No description provided.

@kim-em kim-em requested a review from javra December 2, 2022 19:17
@kim-em kim-em mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2022
1 task
@kim-em kim-em requested review from JLimperg and fpvandoorn December 2, 2022 22:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@javra javra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, as long as having ext in aesop_cat does not imply regressions in some examples where we don't want to apply ext... But since tidy also applied ext I'm optimistic.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@kim-em kim-em added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review labels Dec 3, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Dec 3, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore: fix aesop_cat wrapper for aesop [Merged by Bors] - chore: fix aesop_cat wrapper for aesop Dec 3, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 3, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the fix_aesop_cat branch December 3, 2022 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants