[Merged by Bors] - feat: measurability of the derivative of a function depending on a parameter#6903
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - feat: measurability of the derivative of a function depending on a parameter#6903
Conversation
YaelDillies
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2023
| simp only [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivAtFilter, isLittleO_iff] at this | ||
| rcases eventually_nhds_iff_ball.1 (this (half_pos hε)) with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩ | ||
| let δ := (ε/2)/2 | ||
| have hδ : 0 < δ := half_pos (half_pos hε) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could be positivity if you want to
Comment on lines
+942
to
+947
| refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_) | ||
| refine MeasurableSet.iUnion (fun _ ↦ ?_) | ||
| refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_) | ||
| refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_) | ||
| refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_) | ||
| refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_) |
YaelDillies
reviewed
Sep 5, 2023
YaelDillies
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
Contributor
YaelDillies
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not finding any golf anymore.
maintainer merge
|
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by YaelDillies. |
8 tasks
Member
|
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…rameter (#6903) We reuse the main results that were proved for functions not depending on a parameter (but we need to tweak the definition of the set `A` to let it cover all cases, replacing a large inequality by a strict one).
|
Build failed: |
Contributor
Author
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…rameter (#6903) We reuse the main results that were proved for functions not depending on a parameter (but we need to tweak the definition of the set `A` to let it cover all cases, replacing a large inequality by a strict one).
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
kodyvajjha
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2023
…rameter (#6903) We reuse the main results that were proved for functions not depending on a parameter (but we need to tweak the definition of the set `A` to let it cover all cases, replacing a large inequality by a strict one).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We reuse the main results that were proved for functions not depending on a parameter (but we need to tweak the definition of the set
Ato let it cover all cases, replacing a large inequality by a strict one).There are also name cleanups (when a set is named
A, the lemma name should benot_mem_Aand notnot_mem_a, whatever the naming convention says), and a few prerequisites. I can split these off in other PRs if it makes things easier to review, just tell me.