Conversation
…erpart to indicator_iUnion_apply.
|
bors d+ LGTM, thanks! Do you think it's worth having the |
|
✌️ kkytola can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Thank you! That is a good question! I don't have enough experience to have a clear opinion on that. (I guess that has to do with how canonical the sup/inf spelling of functions is considered.) Based on just (1) the fact that the existing |
|
bors r+ |
…terpart to indicator_iUnion_apply. (#6078) Add lemma `mulIndicator_iInter_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iInter_apply`. These are entirely parallel to the existing `mulIndicator_iUnion_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iUnion_apply`.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
…terpart to indicator_iUnion_apply. (#6078) Add lemma `mulIndicator_iInter_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iInter_apply`. These are entirely parallel to the existing `mulIndicator_iUnion_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iUnion_apply`.
…terpart to indicator_iUnion_apply. (#6078) Add lemma `mulIndicator_iInter_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iInter_apply`. These are entirely parallel to the existing `mulIndicator_iUnion_apply` and its additive version `indicator_iUnion_apply`.
Add lemma
mulIndicator_iInter_applyand its additive versionindicator_iInter_apply. These are entirely parallel to the existingmulIndicator_iUnion_applyand its additive versionindicator_iUnion_apply.