[Merged by Bors] - chore: fix backtick in docs#5077
Closed
Conversation
eric-wieser
reviewed
Jun 15, 2023
Comment on lines
-938
to
-939
| may not have unique derivatives, in the following form. If `f : E × F → G` is `C^n+1` at `(x₀, | ||
| g(x₀))` in `(s ∪ {x₀}) × t ⊆ E × F` and `g : E → F` is `C^n` at `x₀` within some set `s ⊆ E`, then |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FWIW, I think this is legal markdown and renders correctly; but I think this change is fine.
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2023
I wrote a script to find lines that contain an odd number of backticks
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
Member
|
Did you use something more advanced than this? |
Contributor
Author
|
@urkud I wrote a 20-line python script import os
def f(rootdir,pre):
for root, subdirs, files in os.walk(rootdir):
for fn in files:
filepath=root+'\\'+fn
with open(filepath) as f:
a=pre+filepath[len(rootdir):].replace('\\','/')
b=f.read()
for i,s in enumerate(b.split('\n')):
s=s.strip()
if s.count('`')%2==0: continue
if s.count('`')==3 and '```' in s: continue
print(f'{a}:{i+1} {s}')
f('D:\\repo\\lean\\mathlib4\\Mathlib','Mathlib')
f('D:\\repo\\lean\\mathlib4\\test','test')
f('D:\\repo\\lean\\mathlib4\\Cache','Cache')
#f('D:\\repo\\lean\\mathlib4\\scripts','scripts')Unfortunately, this script fetches ~1000 lines of macro code that I don't care about |
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2023
I wrote a script to find lines that contain an odd number of backticks
kim-em
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2023
I wrote a script to find lines that contain an odd number of backticks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wrote a script to find lines that contain an odd number of backticks