[Merged by Bors] - chore(RingTheory/Valuation): generalize IsEquiv iffs to Ring#26826
Closed
pechersky wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - chore(RingTheory/Valuation): generalize IsEquiv iffs to Ring#26826pechersky wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
pechersky wants to merge 1 commit intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv but that is only true in a divison ring context while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring
PR summary 00c9085f64Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
2 tasks
Contributor
|
bors r+ |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2025
before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv but that is only true in a divison ring context while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
joelriou
pushed a commit
to joelriou/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2025
…ver-community#26826) before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv but that is only true in a divison ring context while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring
callesonne
pushed a commit
to callesonne/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
…ver-community#26826) before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv but that is only true in a divison ring context while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring
hrmacbeth
pushed a commit
to szqzs/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2025
…ver-community#26826) before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv but that is only true in a divison ring context while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
before they were aliased out of iffs that showed that these conditions were sufficied to prove IsEquiv
but that is only true in a divison ring context
while the inequalities remain valid even in Ring