[Merged by Bors] - fix(Order): remove leftover OrderDual from Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq#24776
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - fix(Order): remove leftover OrderDual from Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq#24776
OrderDual from Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq#24776Conversation
PR summary 8fced728ddImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>The doc-module for No changes to technical debt.You can run this locally as
|
YaelDillies
approved these changes
May 11, 2025
Contributor
YaelDillies
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! 🚀
maintainer merge
|
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by YaelDillies. |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2025
…ing_seq` (#24776) From [#mathlib4 > Why does `Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq` takes order d...](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/Why.20does.20.60Set.2EisWF_iff_no_descending_seq.60.20takes.20order.20d.2E.2E.2E/with/517314153)
Contributor
|
Build failed: |
Collaborator
Author
|
Eh... the merge failed at https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/actions/runs/14956597582/job/42013117936 because
I clicked re-run and it succeeded, but it doesn't seem to restart the merge attempt |
Collaborator
Author
|
Not sure if I have permission to re-run |
Contributor
|
🔒 Permission denied Existing reviewers: click here to make wwylele a reviewer |
Collaborator
Author
|
@b-mehta could you help restarting the bot? |
Contributor
|
bors merge |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2025
…ing_seq` (#24776) From [#mathlib4 > Why does `Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq` takes order d...](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/Why.20does.20.60Set.2EisWF_iff_no_descending_seq.60.20takes.20order.20d.2E.2E.2E/with/517314153)
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
OrderDual from Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seqOrderDual from Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq
tannerduve
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
…ing_seq` (#24776) From [#mathlib4 > Why does `Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq` takes order d...](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/Why.20does.20.60Set.2EisWF_iff_no_descending_seq.60.20takes.20order.20d.2E.2E.2E/with/517314153)
bwehlin
pushed a commit
to bwehlin/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2025
…ing_seq` (leanprover-community#24776) From [#mathlib4 > Why does &leanprover-community#96;Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq&leanprover-community#96; takes order d...](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/Why.20does.20.60Set.2EisWF_iff_no_descending_seq.60.20takes.20order.20d.2E.2E.2E/with/517314153)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
From #mathlib4 > Why does `Set.isWF_iff_no_descending_seq` takes order d...