feat: ContinuousLinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}#23971
feat: ContinuousLinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}#23971
Conversation
91ec070 to
b180365
Compare
PR summary 50e49dc2e9Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
|
Let me cross-reference #9105 (a stale delegated PR adding the LinearEquiv version via AddEquiv) and this zulip thread I started about comparing these approaches. |
|
Please go with the |
|
Indeed! Let's land #24168 first, and see if anything remains to be done. |
43f6a7f to
93bfea4
Compare
93bfea4 to
46e4ade
Compare
46e4ade to
2199b5e
Compare
|
This PR/issue depends on: |
15af813 to
76b47da
Compare
34b16c2 to
d16f5e3
Compare
|
CI failed with an error not related to this PR, so I merged master... except that I rebased and force-pushed. Sorry if you have to re-review everything now! |
|
This PR has been migrated to a fork-based workflow: #26083 |
…nity#26083) which are `LinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}` as a continuous linear equivalence. Discovered when working on slice models for defining submanifolds (leanprover-community#24550), one step towards defining smooth submanifolds. This PR continues the work from leanprover-community#23971.
…nity#26083) which are `LinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}` as a continuous linear equivalence. Discovered when working on slice models for defining submanifolds (leanprover-community#24550), one step towards defining smooth submanifolds. This PR continues the work from leanprover-community#23971.
…nity#26083) which are `LinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}` as a continuous linear equivalence. Discovered when working on slice models for defining submanifolds (leanprover-community#24550), one step towards defining smooth submanifolds. This PR continues the work from leanprover-community#23971.
which are
LinearEquiv.{prodUnique,uniqueProd}as a continuous linear equivalence.Discovered when working on slice models for defining submanifolds (#24550), one step towards defining smooth submanifolds.