Skip to content

perf: qqify two functions in linarith#19771

Draft
robertylewis wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
qq-linarith
Draft

perf: qqify two functions in linarith#19771
robertylewis wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
qq-linarith

Conversation

@robertylewis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member


Open in Gitpod

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

PR summary abb47c5b65

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

- proveEqZeroUsing

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


No changes to technical debt.

You can run this locally as

./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
  • The relative value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic.
  • The absolute value is the relative value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).

@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands label Dec 6, 2024
@robertylewis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

!bench

@leanprover-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Here are the benchmark results for commit 2d4175c.
There were no significant changes against commit 6581d46.

mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2025
Inspired by hacking done with @robertylewis and @hrmacbeth which resulted in #19771.

The effect is that the traces messages are now hierarchical; though it's easy not to notice in VSCode without a better version of leanprover/lean4#6345.

See https://profiler.firefox.com/public/smkc5ffh9318w177gps2x9e5b6wy117s6f18e6g/flame-graph/?globalTrackOrder=0&thread=0&transforms=ff-2659&v=10 for an example output produced with
```bash
lake lean MathlibTest/linarith.lean -- \
  -Dtrace.profiler=true \
  -Dtrace.profiler.threshold=1 \
  -Dtrace.profiler.output.pp=true \
  -Dtrace.profiler.output=linarith-profile.json
```

Some inconclusive discussion about best practices for `withTraceNode` is [on Zulip here](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/Using.20withTraceNode/near/489198580).



Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Jan 11, 2025
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Jan 14, 2025
@grunweg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

grunweg commented Apr 5, 2025

Coming here for PR triage: what's the status of this PR? Should this be marked help-wanted or please-adopt?

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Apr 9, 2025
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request has conflicts, please merge master and resolve them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants