Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory/SmallObject/Iteration): the unique morphism (limit case)#18137

Closed
joelriou wants to merge 19 commits intomasterfrom
small-object-6
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory/SmallObject/Iteration): the unique morphism (limit case)#18137
joelriou wants to merge 19 commits intomasterfrom
small-object-6

Conversation

@joelriou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joelriou joelriou commented Oct 23, 2024

@joelriou joelriou added t-category-theory Category theory WIP Work in progress labels Oct 23, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Oct 23, 2024

PR summary 24c18055eb

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

+ instance : Nonempty (iter₁ ⟶ iter₂) := by
+ instance : Unique (iter₁ ⟶ iter₂)
+ iso
+ iso_refl
+ iso_trans
+ mkOfLimit
+ mkOfLimitNatTrans
+ mkOfLimitNatTransApp
+ mkOfLimitNatTransApp_eq_of_lt
+ mkOfLimitNatTransApp_naturality_top

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


Increase in tech debt: 1.00
Current number Change Type
1555 1 erw

Current commit 24c18055eb
Reference commit 23ecdee3fc

You can run this locally as

./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary

@mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Oct 23, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Oct 25, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) and removed merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) labels Oct 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <junyanxu.math@gmail.com>
@joelriou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks @alreadydone for the suggestions!

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Oct 27, 2024
@mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot removed the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Nov 10, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Nov 10, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Nov 12, 2024
@joelriou joelriou removed the WIP Work in progress label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TwoFX TwoFX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, just one question.
bors d+

Comment on lines +241 to +243
lemma iso_refl : iso iter₁ iter₁ = Iso.refl _ := by aesop_cat

lemma iso_trans : iso iter₁ iter₂ ≪≫ iso iter₂ iter₃ = iso iter₁ iter₃ := by aesop_cat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know how the place where you're applying iso_trans looks like, but would it make sense to provide Unique (iter₁ ≅ iter₂) instead (or in addition)?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the suggestion. I will try to see if this idea may help or not in the future downsteam PRs.

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Nov 14, 2024

✌️ joelriou can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@ghost ghost added the delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). label Nov 14, 2024
@joelriou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks!

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Nov 14, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…t case) (#18137)




Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(CategoryTheory/SmallObject/Iteration): the unique morphism (limit case) [Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory/SmallObject/Iteration): the unique morphism (limit case) Nov 14, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Nov 14, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the small-object-6 branch November 14, 2024 20:21
TobiasLeichtfried pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
…t case) (#18137)




Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-category-theory Category theory

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants