[Merged by Bors] - chore: Fix statement of eq_iff_not_lt_of_le#15829
Closed
YaelDillies wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - chore: Fix statement of eq_iff_not_lt_of_le#15829YaelDillies wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
eq_iff_not_lt_of_le#15829YaelDillies wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
The statement said `(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < b` instead of the intended `a ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b)`. While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out a `PartialOrder` section.
3 tasks
PR summary 9608bbe59dImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diff
You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>The doc-module for |
Collaborator
|
LGTM |
Contributor
|
Thanks! bors r+ |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
The statement said `(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < b` instead of the intended `a ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b)`. While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out a `PartialOrder` section.
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
eq_iff_not_lt_of_leeq_iff_not_lt_of_le
bjoernkjoshanssen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
The statement said `(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < b` instead of the intended `a ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b)`. While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out a `PartialOrder` section.
bjoernkjoshanssen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
The statement said `(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < b` instead of the intended `a ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b)`. While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out a `PartialOrder` section.
bjoernkjoshanssen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
The statement said `(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < b` instead of the intended `a ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b)`. While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out a `PartialOrder` section.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The statement said
(a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ ¬a < binstead of the intendeda ≤ b → (b = a ↔ ¬a < b). While both are true, the latter is the more useful one. Also pull out aPartialOrdersection.