[Merged by Bors] - chore: make (x : M) implicit in extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless#10081
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - chore: make (x : M) implicit in extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless#10081
extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless#10081Conversation
…ndaryless` Fixes an oversight in #9894: x is already included in the hypothesis `hx`, so should be implicit. A follow-up PR will address this issue more systematically.
winstonyin
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2024
Collaborator
winstonyin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pretty straightforward.
Contributor
|
Thanks! bors merge |
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundarylessextChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes an oversight in #10001: x is already included in the hypothesis
hx, so should be implicit.A follow-up PR will address this issue more systematically.