fix: module system: remove WellFounded-specific hacks#9143
Merged
Conversation
This PR removes a rather ugly hack in the module system, exposing the bodies of theorems whose type mention `WellFounded`. The original motivation was that reducing well-founded definitions (e.g. in `by rfl`) requires reducing proofs, so they need to be available. But reducing proofs is generally fraught with peril, and we have been nudging our users away from using it for a while, e.g. in #5182. Since the module system is opt-in and users will gradually migrate to it, it may be reasonable to expect them to avoid reducing well-founded recursion in the process This way we don't need hacks like this (which, without evidence, I believe would be incomplete anyways) and we get the nice guarantee that within the module system, theorems bodies are always private.
Collaborator
|
Reference manual CI status:
|
ghost
pushed a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2025
ghost
pushed a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2025
|
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR removes a rather ugly hack in the module system, exposing the bodies of theorems whose type mention
WellFounded.The original motivation was that reducing well-founded definitions (e.g. in
by rfl) requires reducing proofs, so they need to be available.But reducing proofs is generally fraught with peril, and we have been nudging our users away from using it for a while, e.g. in #5182. Since the module system is opt-in and users will gradually migrate to it, it may be reasonable to expect them to avoid reducing well-founded recursion in the process
This way we don't need hacks like this (which, without evidence, I believe would be incomplete anyways) and we get the nice guarantee that within the module system, theorems bodies are always private.