Skip to content

feat: redefine Range.forIn'#6390

Merged
kim-em merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
range_forin
Dec 15, 2024
Merged

feat: redefine Range.forIn'#6390
kim-em merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
range_forin

Conversation

@kim-em
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@kim-em kim-em commented Dec 15, 2024

This PR redefines Range.forIn' and Range.forM, in preparation for writing lemmas about them.

@kim-em kim-em requested a review from leodemoura as a code owner December 15, 2024 07:10
@kim-em kim-em added the changelog-library Library label Dec 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to lean-lang.org/lean4/doc December 15, 2024 07:39 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Dec 15, 2024
ghost pushed a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
ghost pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
@ghost ghost added the breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan label Dec 15, 2024
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ghost commented Dec 15, 2024

Mathlib CI status (docs):

kim-em added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
@kim-em kim-em added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 15, 2024
kim-em added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 474adc8 Dec 15, 2024
@ghost ghost added builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR and removed breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan labels Dec 15, 2024
luisacicolini pushed a commit to opencompl/lean4 that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
This PR redefines `Range.forIn'` and `Range.forM`, in preparation for
writing lemmas about them.
JovanGerb pushed a commit to JovanGerb/lean4 that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
This PR redefines `Range.forIn'` and `Range.forM`, in preparation for
writing lemmas about them.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR changelog-library Library toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant