Skip to content

feat: fetch block numbers in store api + refactor: remove unwraps from libmdx impl of store#150

Merged
MegaRedHand merged 22 commits into
mainfrom
add-block-number-table
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

feat: fetch block numbers in store api + refactor: remove unwraps from libmdx impl of store#150
MegaRedHand merged 22 commits into
mainfrom
add-block-number-table

Conversation

@fmoletta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #146, please merge it first

Motivation

Add a way to fetch blocks from their hashes (as blocks are stored by number this translates to adding a block_hash -> block_number mapping)

Description

  • Add get_block_number & add_block_number methods to Store (both using block_hash as key)
  • Remove unwraps from libmdx impl of Store

Closes None, but is needed in order to implement #31

@fmoletta fmoletta marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 21:36
@fmoletta fmoletta requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2024 21:36
Base automatically changed from add-block-api-to-db to main July 16, 2024 13:32
Comment thread crates/storage/src/error.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/storage/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/storage/src/libmdbx.rs

@ElFantasma ElFantasma left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@MegaRedHand MegaRedHand merged commit 944fb74 into main Jul 17, 2024
@MegaRedHand MegaRedHand deleted the add-block-number-table branch July 17, 2024 11:22
MegaRedHand pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
…#145)

Based on #150, please merge it first

**Motivation**

Comply with rpc spec for `eth_getBlockByNumber` & `eth_getBlockByHash`

<!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? -->

**Description**
* Integrate `Store` as a state for the rpc api

* Add RPC endpoints `eth_getBlockByNumber` & `eth_getBlockByHash`

<!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR
introduces -->

<!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->

Closes #31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants