Skip to content

Make existing e2e tests to use container-vm explicitly#417

Merged
vishh merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:force-debian
Aug 22, 2016
Merged

Make existing e2e tests to use container-vm explicitly#417
vishh merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:force-debian

Conversation

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vishh vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

This is required to prepare for the switch to gci as default.
For kubernetes/kubernetes#25276


This change is Reviewable

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

cc @pwittrock

@wonderfly
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

nit: The tests are using containervm. So consider changing the commit message to something like Make tests use container-vm explicitly.

@dchen1107 dchen1107 self-assigned this Aug 19, 2016
@dchen1107
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+1 on #417 (comment)

@dchen1107
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Besides above nit, LGTM

@vishh vishh changed the title Force existing tests to use container-vm Make existing e2e tests to use container-vm explicitly Aug 19, 2016
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

PR title updated

@dchen1107
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@dchen1107 dchen1107 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2016
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

ping @kubernetes/test-infra-maintainers

@spxtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

spxtr commented Aug 19, 2016

It seems like excess copy-paste. Which jobs don't need this set?

Probably fine, though.


Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/kubernetes-pull.yaml, line 330 [r1] (raw file):

            export KUBE_FASTBUILD=true
            export KUBE_GCS_UPDATE_LATEST=n

nit: whitespace here and in a few other places.


Comments from Reviewable

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

I plan on adding tests that will use gci instead of container-vm next.
After that, k8s HEAD will switch to using gci by default. This PR is
necessary to prevent existing tests from accidentally testing gci instead
of container-vm.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Joe Finney notifications@github.com
wrote:

It seems like excess copy-paste. Which jobs don't need this set?

Probably fine, though.

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved

discussion.

jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/kubernetes-pull.yaml, line
330 [r1]
https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/kubernetes/test-infra/417#-KPZe7wF3k1M5CNHKqIP:-KPZe7wF3k1M5CNHKqIQ:bmhmjmo
(raw file

):

        export KUBE_FASTBUILD=true
        export KUBE_GCS_UPDATE_LATEST=n

nit: whitespace here and in a few other places.

Comments from Reviewable
https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/kubernetes/test-infra/417#-:-KPZeEymEmJj5tH5GcNE:bo03kcu


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#417 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGvIKPwZuEb6k7LKE74wh-R4l21mIGTqks5qhh0qgaJpZM4Jo0YO
.

@vishh vishh force-pushed the force-debian branch 2 times, most recently from e71c9bb to b854978 Compare August 19, 2016 22:18
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 19, 2016

@spxtr PTAL.


Review status: 5 of 6 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


Comments from Reviewable

@spxtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

spxtr commented Aug 19, 2016

Review status: 5 of 6 files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions.


jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/kubernetes-pull.yaml, line 329 [r2] (raw file):

            export KUBE_RUN_FROM_OUTPUT=y
            export KUBE_FASTBUILD=true
            export KUBE_GCS_UPDATE_LATEST=n            

Sorry, I meant you should remove all trailing whitespace. I don't think you need any whitespace on blank lines.


Comments from Reviewable

… switch to gci as default

Signed-off-by: Vishnu kannan <vishnuk@google.com>
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 22, 2016

@spxtr PTAL


Review status: 5 of 6 files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions.


jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/kubernetes-pull.yaml, line 330 [r1] (raw file):

Previously, spxtr (Joe Finney) wrote…

nit: whitespace here and in a few other places.

Oops. I did not notice the trailing spaces.

Comments from Reviewable

@spxtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

spxtr commented Aug 22, 2016

:lgtm:


Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


Comments from Reviewable

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Aug 22, 2016

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


jenkins/job-configs/kubernetes-jenkins-pull/kubernetes-pull.yaml, line 329 [r2] (raw file):

Previously, spxtr (Joe Finney) wrote…

Sorry, I meant you should remove all trailing whitespace. I don't think you need any whitespace on blank lines.

Done.

Comments from Reviewable

@vishh vishh merged commit 00171d0 into kubernetes:master Aug 22, 2016
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit to kubernetes/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2016
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Use upgraded container-vm by default on worker nodes for GCE k8s clusters

For #25276
Depends on kubernetes/test-infra#417
foxish pushed a commit to foxish/test-infra that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2017
ostromart pushed a commit to ostromart/test-infra that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2019
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Explicitly set node selector

Prow has 2 node pool. It is possible that some jobs are scheduled on the wrong pool explaining why we experience kubernetes#396.

```release-note
NONE
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants