[doc] Add checklist about external plugins/patches, testing nightly and searching issues to bug report template#15072
Conversation
|
Do/should we mention somewhere that "if you use external plugins or user-patches, try first to reproduce your issue with all of them disabled" or something ? |
| - type: dropdown | ||
| id: regression | ||
| attributes: | ||
| label: Regression | ||
| description: Did this issue start happening after a recent update? | ||
| options: | ||
| - Yes | ||
| - No | ||
| - Not sure | ||
| validations: | ||
| required: true | ||
|
|
||
| - type: input | ||
| id: last-working-version | ||
| attributes: | ||
| label: Last working version | ||
| description: If this issue is a regression, please specify the last version of KOReader where the issue did not occur. | ||
| placeholder: e.g., 2026.03, 2025.10-164-gf12ff96ad_2026-03-03 | ||
| validations: | ||
| required: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@poire-z @benoit-pierre Do you suppose this is helpful or just noise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Helpful, most won't care, but some will think about that and may give us some hints.
Some issue when I try to view the file:
Critical There is a problem with this template
body[6]: options must not include booleans. Please wrap values such as 'yes', and 'true' in quotes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was fixing that as you were typing it. :-)
|
Yes, looks great! The more information user provides (especially with and without trying nightly) the better. |
|
one thing to note though, sometimes disabling patches/plugins might still lead to crashes, even if not our fault, in this example #15054 the damage had been done by a patch and it continued to affect the programme afterwards, so I guess what I am saying is: "constant vigilance" |
Every single bug report issue now going to linked with #11068 which looks spammy. Better to hyperlink with wiki? |
|
Well, we've been there before :D
|
|
Yes I understand, having the checkbox is fine. My request is don't force users to test the nightly version. Let them file bug report without marking that checkbox. |
|
Yeah, I think we should force them to also write the full version hash of the nightly they tried :D Otherwise it is impossible to understand where they stand |
In some sense, but stable is definitely tested more. Anyway, I didn't realize it'd take any link as a reference. Drat. |
… reference to nightly ticket (#15084) See <#15072 (comment)>.
…nd searching issues to bug report template (koreader#15072) Also add field asking for regression info.
… reference to nightly ticket (koreader#15084) See <koreader#15072 (comment)>.
@mergen3107 Does that look how you envision it?
This change is