seccomp: Add bitmap cache of constant allow filter results#139
Closed
kernel-patches-bot wants to merge 1 commit intobpf-nextfrom
Closed
seccomp: Add bitmap cache of constant allow filter results#139kernel-patches-bot wants to merge 1 commit intobpf-nextfrom
kernel-patches-bot wants to merge 1 commit intobpf-nextfrom
Conversation
Author
|
Master branch: 963ec27 Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bpf/list/?series=357881 conflict: |
Author
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bpf/list/?series=357881 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
danielocfb
referenced
this pull request
in danielocfb/kernel-patches-bpf
Jul 28, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 125+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2022
The send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint is pretty flaky, with at least one failure in every ten runs on a few attempts I've tried it: > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_c2p 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_p2c 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:fork 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:skel_attach 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_read 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:PASS:reading pipe error: size 0 0 nsec > test_send_signal_common:FAIL:incorrect result unexpected incorrect result: actual 48 != expected 50 > test_send_signal_common:PASS:pipe_write 0 nsec > #139/1 send_signal/send_signal_tracepoint:FAIL The reason does not appear to be a correctness issue in the strict sense. Rather, we merely do not receive the signal we are waiting for within the provided timeout. Let's bump the timeout by a factor of ten. With that change I have not been able to reproduce the failure in 150+ iterations. I am also sneaking in a small simplification to the test_progs test selection logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220727182955.4044988-1-deso@posteo.net
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2023
Fix an integer underflow that leads to a null pointer dereference in 'mt7601u_rx_skb_from_seg()'. The variable 'dma_len' in the URB packet could be manipulated, which could trigger an integer underflow of 'seg_len' in 'mt7601u_rx_process_seg()'. This underflow subsequently causes the 'bad_frame' checks in 'mt7601u_rx_skb_from_seg()' to be bypassed, eventually leading to a dereference of the pointer 'p', which is a null pointer. Ensure that 'dma_len' is greater than 'min_seg_len'. Found by a modified version of syzkaller. KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Tainted: G W O 5.14.0+ #139 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:skb_add_rx_frag+0x143/0x370 Code: e2 07 83 c2 03 38 ca 7c 08 84 c9 0f 85 86 01 00 00 4c 8d 7d 08 44 89 68 08 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 cd 01 00 00 48 8b 45 08 a8 01 0f 85 3d 01 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900000cfc90 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115520dc0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8881118430c0 RDI: ffff8881118430f8 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000e09 R09: 0000000000000010 R10: ffff888111843017 R11: ffffed1022308602 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000e09 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: 0000000000000008 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811a800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000004035af40 CR3: 00000001157f2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: mt7601u_rx_tasklet+0xc73/0x1270 ? mt7601u_submit_rx_buf.isra.0+0x510/0x510 ? tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x79/0x2f0 tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x206/0x2f0 __do_softirq+0x1b5/0x880 ? tasklet_unlock+0x30/0x30 run_ksoftirqd+0x26/0x50 smpboot_thread_fn+0x34f/0x7d0 ? smpboot_register_percpu_thread+0x370/0x370 kthread+0x3a1/0x480 ? set_kthread_struct+0x120/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Modules linked in: 88XXau(O) 88x2bu(O) ---[ end trace 57f34f93b4da0f9b ]--- RIP: 0010:skb_add_rx_frag+0x143/0x370 Code: e2 07 83 c2 03 38 ca 7c 08 84 c9 0f 85 86 01 00 00 4c 8d 7d 08 44 89 68 08 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 cd 01 00 00 48 8b 45 08 a8 01 0f 85 3d 01 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900000cfc90 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115520dc0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8881118430c0 RDI: ffff8881118430f8 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000e09 R09: 0000000000000010 R10: ffff888111843017 R11: ffffed1022308602 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000e09 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: 0000000000000008 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811a800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000004035af40 CR3: 00000001157f2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Signed-off-by: Jisoo Jang <jisoo.jang@yonsei.ac.kr> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221229092906.2328282-1-jisoo.jang@yonsei.ac.kr
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Convert hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() to hlist_for_each_entry() to avoid the suspicious RCU usage warning [1] and add an assertion to make sure the RTNL mutex is held when the function is called. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
The per-netns IP tunnel hash table is protected by the RTNL mutex and ip_tunnel_find() is only called from the control path where the mutex is taken. Add a lockdep expression to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() in ip_tunnel_find() in order to validate that the mutex is held and to silence the suspicious RCU usage warning [1]. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:221 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/362: #0: ffffffff86fc7cb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x377/0xf60 stack backtrace: CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 362 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-gd95d9a31aceb kernel-patches#139 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xba/0x110 lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xd6 ip_tunnel_find+0x435/0x4d0 ip_tunnel_newlink+0x517/0x7a0 ipgre_newlink+0x14c/0x170 __rtnl_newlink+0x1173/0x19c0 rtnl_newlink+0x6c/0xa0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0xf60 netlink_rcv_skb+0x171/0x450 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7f0 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c1/0xd80 ____sys_sendmsg+0x8f9/0xc20 ___sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x1e0 __sys_sendmsg+0x122/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: c544193 ("GRE: Refactor GRE tunneling code.") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: seccomp: Add bitmap cache of constant allow filter results
version: 3
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bpf/list/?series=357881