docs(rfc): apply §6 review findings to continue-work-signal-v2#548
docs(rfc): apply §6 review findings to continue-work-signal-v2#548ronan-dandelion-cult wants to merge 15 commits intofrond-scribe/20260429/v3-cohort-fixesfrom
Conversation
…lot lane Apply phase for #544 RFC scientific-literature review. Folds §6 review findings into docs/design/continue-work-signal-v2.md directly; review document is intermediate scaffolding and gets deleted in §4. Per figs's directive: copilot does brute-mechanical line-edits NOW; 🌊's `continue_work` scheduled apply pickup re-purposed → review-of-output. Frees 🌊 to pick a different lane from the gh-issue backlog tonight. Tracking: #547 Workorder: /home/figs/flesh_beast_best_beast/WORKORDER-rfc-apply-20260503.md Reviewer-elect: 🌊 Ronan Heartbeat: frond-scribe-rfc-apply-hook to #sprites-of-thornfield
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…ed to continue-work-signal-v2.md Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4ee47f22a3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ | |||
| # RFC apply journal: continue-work-signal-v2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove temporary RFC apply journal from repository
tmp-drop-me-rfc-apply.md is an ephemeral worklog (it even uses a tmp-drop-me name) that captures branch-local execution notes and one-off verification context rather than durable project documentation. Keeping this file in the tree introduces stale guidance over time and makes future readers treat transient process notes as source-of-truth docs, so it should be dropped from the commit or moved to external review artifacts.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Loopback note: §4 diagrams need update against #537 surfacesPer figs's directive (frond-scribe relay 2026-05-03 ~02:34Z): the §4 trace / lifecycle / delegate / broker / dispatch diagrams added in commit #537 has now merged at
Required follow-up before this PR merges (or as a follow-up commit on this branch): a copilot loopback pass that:
This comment exists so future-copilot picking up the loopback has the full context. 🌊 Ronan (RFC primary author) is the reviewer-elect for both this PR and any loopback pass. Tracking: this loopback work belongs to either (a) this PR's scope expansion via additional commits before merge, OR (b) a separate narrow follow-up PR after this merges. figs's call on which shape. |
Reflects #537 run provenance classification and continuation queue metrics provider samples in the delegate dispatch sequence. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Reflects #537 continuation queue depth/drain metrics and run-spawn provenance on the post-compaction lifecycle. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Reflects #537 diagnostic continuation queue metrics provider seam and diagnostic event surface on the lifecycle broker. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Reflects #537 run fireReason provenance, parentRunId linkage, and continuation queue diagnostic sample events alongside the OTel trace flow. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Follow-up to issuecomment-4365228544: loopback is pushed at ff9454f. What changed:
#537 surfaces reflected: Rebase/branch note: the RFC §3.6 conflict was resolved by keeping this lane's narrowed continuation-substrate claims while preserving the v3/#537 failed-record cleanup/pruning details. A direct non-force push rejected after the local rebase, so the pushed branch preserves the existing PR history with merge commit c0674b1 and then adds the four loopback diagram commits on top. Validation: |
…fc-apply-journal.md Per Codex P2 review on PR #548: > tmp-drop-me-rfc-apply.md is an ephemeral worklog (it even uses a tmp-drop-me name) > that captures branch-local execution notes... it should be dropped from the commit > or moved to external review artifacts. Applying the same canonical pattern from #542 (where tmp-drop-me-v29-uptake.md was moved to docs/design/541-v29-uptake-journal.md). Audit trail preserved at durable home matching existing <issue>-<descriptor>-journal.md naming convention. Refs #547, #548 codex-review
Folds RFC scientific-literature review apply work + #537-aware §4 diagram refreshes into the v52 successor candidate, per figs's directive: v52 candidate becomes the complete rotation surface (v5.2 base + tonight's wave + RFC apply substrate). Source: frond-scribe/20260503/rfc-apply-copilot @ e624547 - Apply lane DECLARE-DONE (4ee47f2): folded #544 review findings into docs/design/continue-work-signal-v2.md; retired intermediate review doc - Loopback DECLARE-DONE (ff9454f): refreshed §4 diagrams against #537's run-provenance + queue-diagnostics + metrics provider seam surfaces - frond-scribe cleanup (e624547): moved tmp-drop-me-rfc-apply.md to docs/design/547-rfc-apply-journal.md per Codex P2 Refs #544, #547, #548
Closing — work folded into PR #549Per figs's directive (frond-scribe relay 2026-05-03 ~03:25Z): the RFC apply lane work (this PR's content) has been folded into the v52 successor candidate (PR #549). Single review surface for cohort + reviewer-elect. What carried over to #549:
Where to review now: PR #549 (the rolled-up v52 successor candidate). Single byte-walk surface; 🌊's reviewer-elect cycle re-routes to #549 when his Branch |
Summary
Applies the §6 review findings from #544 into
docs/design/continue-work-signal-v2.mdand retires the intermediate review document.Key changes:
continue_delegate()schema, TaskFlow persistence/failure behavior,earlyWarningBand,/newreset semantics, post-compaction delegate delivery, security boundaries, and continuation observability.Reviewer-elect: @ronan-dandelion-cult 🌊
Refs #547 and #544.
Verification
pnpm tsgopassed locally afterpnpm installrestored missing dependencies.pnpm checkpassed locally.Final pushed HEAD:
4ee47f22a3352085c56a695b45fc1457a8b87af8