The spec isn't as clear on these as it normally is it seems :/ but what part makes you say these are invalid? They seem like they should all be valid to me, and that like most other properties unevaluated* skips any non-relevant types.

what part makes you say these are invalid?

I hadn't really given it much thought. I was mostly dealing with the Python library which was raising an exception on unexpected input, regardless of the validity against the schema. I'll update the tests to mark them as expected to pass instead, because I agree with the relevance argument

It looks like we (the spec) no longer has specific sentences in each validator saying "the properties validator MUST consider valid any instance which is not an object" (or never did? Maybe I'm misremembering?).

Instead it says once, in 7.6.1:

Most assertions only constrain values within a certain primitive type. When the type of the instance is not of the type targeted by the keyword, the instance is considered to conform to the assertion.

So yeah it would seem that indeed these are all valid (as they are for other properties).

I may be missing it but it seems like it could be slightly easier to know when and how to apply 7.6.1 to each validator if the intended type was called out more explicitly. As-is it seems there's theoretically room for argument as to whether that section is intended for any given specific validator. CC @Relequestual to see if he has thoughts, though if I'm honest I only skimmed the spec and could be missing something.

Regardless, for the purposes of this suite, this is good now, thanks.

These tests should be added to draft2019-09 and draft-next as well.

That was done (in the linked commit) :)