Use check-spelling/check-spelling@v0.0.21#9199
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thank you for upgrading our workflow to the newer version. |
|
I initially had logic that was a lot more tolerant of The only "fix" for this is supplemental dictionaries that are more complete. As it happens, some of the dictionaries that check-spelling considers (the main cpp one and the win32 one) have way more words, but they unfortunately have gobs of typos, which means they're really not great to use -- I need to spend a couple of days or weeks pruning out their typos before I could personally suggest using them (I tried for cpp a couple of times and gave up)... |
|
Thanks @jsoref |
Josh Soref: Use check-spelling/check-spelling@v0.0.21 (#9199) Merge pull request 9199
This is a 🐛 bug fix.
Summary
candidate.patternswill suggest entries forpatterns.txt, e.g.:Context