Skip to content

Mark highlight mark_lines feature as 4.4 in docs#9184

Merged
jekyllbot merged 2 commits intojekyll:masterfrom
big-andy-coates:highlight__mark_lines__docs
Jan 27, 2023
Merged

Mark highlight mark_lines feature as 4.4 in docs#9184
jekyllbot merged 2 commits intojekyll:masterfrom
big-andy-coates:highlight__mark_lines__docs

Conversation

@big-andy-coates
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a 🔦 documentation change.

Summary

The use of mark_lines in the highlight liquid tag, added in #9138, is merged but not yet released.

The docs on the live site have been updated to reflect this new, but unreleased functionality: https://jekyllrb.com/docs/liquid/tags/#marking-specific-lines. This could be confusing to people... it took me some digging to work out why it wasn't working ;)

I'm not sure if this is the correct approach, but this PR tags the feature in the docs as requiring the upcoming 4.4.0 release...

big-andy-coates and others added 2 commits November 15, 2022 22:41
…l#9138, is merged but not yet released.

The docs on the live site have been updated to reflect this new, but unreleased functionality: https://jekyllrb.com/docs/liquid/tags/#marking-specific-lines. This could be confusing to people... it took me some digging to work out why it wasn't working ;)

I'm not sure if this is the correct approach, but this PR tags the feature in the docs as requiring the upcoming `4.4.0` release...
@ashmaroli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @big-andy-coates
@jekyllbot: merge +doc

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit ef62f74 into jekyll:master Jan 27, 2023
jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
Andy Coates: Mark `highlight` `mark_lines` feature as 4.4 in docs (#9184)

Merge pull request 9184
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants