Skip to content

introduce new feature flag for auto_sni#38604

Merged
istio-testing merged 1 commit intoistio:masterfrom
Nordix:feature-flag-for-auto-sni
Apr 27, 2022
Merged

introduce new feature flag for auto_sni#38604
istio-testing merged 1 commit intoistio:masterfrom
Nordix:feature-flag-for-auto-sni

Conversation

@kfaseela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense
to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni,
and only auto_san_validation should be clubbed with existing VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT feature flag.
RFC has been updated accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Faseela K faseela.k@est.tech

Please provide a description of this PR:

To help us figure out who should review this PR, please put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.

  • Configuration Infrastructure
  • Docs
  • Installation
  • [ X] Networking
  • Performance and Scalability
  • Policies and Telemetry
  • Security
  • Test and Release
  • User Experience
  • Developer Infrastructure

Please check any characteristics that apply to this pull request.

  • [ X] Does not have any user-facing changes. This may include CLI changes, API changes, behavior changes, performance improvements, etc.

@kfaseela kfaseela requested review from a team as code owners April 26, 2022 20:56
@istio-policy-bot istio-policy-bot added area/networking release-notes-none Indicates a PR that does not require release notes. labels Apr 26, 2022
@istio-testing istio-testing added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 26, 2022
@kfaseela kfaseela force-pushed the feature-flag-for-auto-sni branch from aa85f66 to 33b4692 Compare April 26, 2022 21:11
A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense
to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni,
and auto_san_validation should be clubbed with VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT.
RFC has been updated accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>
@kfaseela kfaseela force-pushed the feature-flag-for-auto-sni branch from 33b4692 to 274c406 Compare April 26, 2022 21:13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@hzxuzhonghu hzxuzhonghu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kfaseela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@kfaseela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/test integ-pilot-istiodremote-mc_istio

@istio-testing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38611

l8huang pushed a commit to l8huang/istio that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2022
* Add auto-sni support (istio#38238)

* [WIP] Add auto-sni support

Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>

* Fix unit test failure

Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>

* enhance release-notes and small code improvements

Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>

* introduce new feature flag for auto_sni (istio#38604)

A later discussion concluded that it makes better sense
to introduce a new feature flag for enabling auto_sni,
and auto_san_validation should be clubbed with VERIFY_CERT_AT_CLIENT.
RFC has been updated accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>

* fix unit test

Co-authored-by: Faseela K <faseela.k@est.tech>
@kfaseela kfaseela deleted the feature-flag-for-auto-sni branch August 5, 2022 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/networking release-notes-none Indicates a PR that does not require release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants