fix: support directory listings even if a 404 page is present#7339
Merged
fix: support directory listings even if a 404 page is present#7339
Conversation
fixes #4233 (comment) Basically, there's a trade-off here: 1. We can support directory listings while supporting 404 pages (this PR). 2. If a 404 page is present, directory listings don't work. Given that option 1 is more flexible and users shouldn't be _too_ confused if they land on a directory with no index.html page, I've gone with that option.
Member
Author
willscott
approved these changes
May 21, 2020
hacdias
pushed a commit
to ipfs/boxo
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2023
fix: support directory listings even if a 404 page is present This commit was moved from ipfs/kubo@edcd118
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #4233 (comment)
Basically, there's a trade-off here:
Given that option 1 is more flexible and users shouldn't be too confused if they land on a directory with no index.html page, I've gone with that option.