[SYCL] Enable algorithm support for sub_group#1392
Merged
bader merged 17 commits intointel:syclfrom Mar 27, 2020
Merged
Conversation
bader
reviewed
Mar 26, 2020
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
- sub_group member functions marked deprecated, to be removed later. - SPIR-V helpers expanded to convert SYCL group to SPIR-V scope. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Multiple definition errors again... Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Takes message as a string. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
8c7725e to
38f2906
Compare
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
bader
reviewed
Mar 27, 2020
| } | ||
|
|
||
| template <typename T, class BinaryOperation> | ||
| #if __cplusplus >= 201402L |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You don't need this #if anymore.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other than this small clean-up, the patch looks good to me.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, you're right. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
bader
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2020
jsji
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
This storage class is used for function pointers. It's added as based on cl_intel_function_pointers specification, it is not guaranteed that sizeof(void(*)(void) == sizeof(void *) - to allow consumers use this fact, we cannot say that function pointer belongs to the same storage class as data pointers. It wasn't added during initial implementation, now it's time to fill this gap. As it would be a breaking change its generation is added only under -spirv-emit-function-ptr-addr-space option. Also SPIR-V consumer may pass this option during reverse translation to get new address space even in a case, when OpConstantFunctionPointerINTEL doesn't reside in CodeSectionINTEL storage class. Expected behavior: No option is passed to the forward translation stage and function pointers are in addrspace(9): no CodeSectionINTEL storage class in SPIR-V The option is passed to the forward translation stage and function pointers are in addrepace(9): CodeSectionINTEL storage class is generated No option is passed to the reverse translation stage: function pointers are in private address space The option is passed to the reverse translation stage: function pointers are in addrspace(9) Spec: https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/sycl/doc/design/spirv-extensions/SPV_INTEL_function_pointers.asciidoc The previous approach: #1392 Original commit: KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator@46c9eb9ea9b4c6f
jsji
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
This storage class is used for function pointers. It's added as based on cl_intel_function_pointers specification, it is not guaranteed that sizeof(void(*)(void) == sizeof(void *) - to allow consumers use this fact, we cannot say that function pointer belongs to the same storage class as data pointers. It wasn't added during initial implementation, now it's time to fill this gap. As it would be a breaking change its generation is added only under -spirv-emit-function-ptr-addr-space option. Also SPIR-V consumer may pass this option during reverse translation to get new address space even in a case, when OpConstantFunctionPointerINTEL doesn't reside in CodeSectionINTEL storage class. Expected behavior: No option is passed to the forward translation stage and function pointers are in addrspace(9): no CodeSectionINTEL storage class in SPIR-V The option is passed to the forward translation stage and function pointers are in addrepace(9): CodeSectionINTEL storage class is generated No option is passed to the reverse translation stage: function pointers are in private address space The option is passed to the reverse translation stage: function pointers are in addrspace(9) Spec: https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/sycl/doc/design/spirv-extensions/SPV_INTEL_function_pointers.asciidoc The previous approach: #1392 Original commit: KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator@46c9eb9ea9b4c6f
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook john.pennycook@intel.com