Enable execution on GPU and ACC by lazvlaale · Pull Request #1 · intel/llvm

lazvlaale · 2019-01-23T07:55:14Z

This PR is used to check CI settings. It will be dismissed.

bader · 2019-01-23T15:26:15Z

Could you provide more justification in the PR description?
Is this test passing on GPU and ACC?

vladimirlaz · 2019-01-23T15:36:48Z

This PR is used to check CI setting. It will be dismissed

…implify (#1) This is the second of a series of patches simplifying llvm-symbolizer tests. See r352752 for the first. This one splits out 5 distinct test cases from llvm-symbolizer.test into separate tests, and simplifies them slightly by using --obj/positional arguments for the input file and addresses instead of stdin. See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40070#c1 for the motivation. Reviewed by: dblaikie Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57443 llvm-svn: 352753

/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/Posix/bcmp_test.cc:14:12: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input // CHECK: {{#1.*bcmp}} ^ <stdin>:2:57: note: scanning from here ==34677==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffee93777c4 at pc 0x0001068a7285 bp 0x7ffee9377770 sp 0x7ffee9376ef8 ^ <stdin>:6:20: note: possible intended match here #2 0x106888e77 in main bcmp_test.cc:12 ^ llvm-svn: 354888

llvm-svn: 355013

After D55626 I see a failure in my Fedora buildbot. There is uninitialized variable as the Foo constructor has not been run and foo is an autovariable. (lldb) breakpoint set -f foo.cpp -l 11 Breakpoint 1: where = TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out`main + 30 at foo.cpp:11:7, address = 0x000000000040112e (lldb) run Process 801065 stopped * thread #1, name = 'TestDataFormatt', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x000000000040112e TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffcc48) at foo.cpp:11:7 8 }; 9 10 int main(int argc, char **argv) { -> 11 Foo foo(1, 2.22); 12 return 0; 13 } Process 801065 launched: '.../tools/lldb/lit/Reproducer/Functionalities/Output/TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out' (x86_64) (lldb) frame var (int) argc = 1 (char **) argv = 0x00007fffffffcc48 (Foo) foo = (m_i = 4198432, m_d = 0) While the testcase expects m_i will be 0. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59088 llvm-svn: 355611

Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots: ``` ================================================================= ==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105 #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19 #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12 #3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136 #4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105 #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29 #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241 #3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16 #4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136 #5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ``` See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information. Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr: ``` ==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44 #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78 #3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9 #4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314 #5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18 #6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474 #8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257 #13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50 #15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49) SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User ``` See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information. llvm-svn: 355616

Currently, the type id for a derived type is computed incorrectly. For example, type #1: int type #2: ptr to #1 For a global variable "int *a", type #1 will be attributed to variable "a". This is due to a bug which assigns the type id of the basetype of that derived type as the derived type's type id. This happens to "const", "volatile", "restrict", "typedef" and "pointer" types. This patch fixed this bug, fixed existing test cases and added a new one focusing on pointers plus other derived types. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> llvm-svn: 356727

The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion failure. An example of the assertion: input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator typedef int T ^ ; input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed. #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1 #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0) #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf) #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa) #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37) #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2) #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type) #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*) #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose() #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string() #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++() #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15 llvm-svn: 357915

…heck. The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion failure. An example of the assertion: input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator typedef int T ^ ; input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed. #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1 #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0) #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf) #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa) #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37) #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2) #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type) #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*) #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose() #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string() #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++() #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15 ........ Breaks windows buildbots llvm-svn: 357918

Re-commit r357915 with a fix for windows. The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion failure. An example of the assertion: input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator typedef int T ^ ; input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed. #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1 #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0) #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf) #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa) #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37) #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2) #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type) #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*) #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose() #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string() #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++() #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15 llvm-svn: 357921

The size field of a location can be different for each entry, so it is useful to have this displayed in the output of llvm-readobj -stackmap. Below is an example of how the output would look: Record ID: 2882400000, instruction offset: 16 3 locations: #1: Constant 1, size: 8 #2: Constant 2, size: 8 #3: Constant 3, size: 8 0 live-outs: [ ] Patch By: jacob.hughes@kcl.ac.uk (with heavy modification by me) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59169 llvm-svn: 358324

A marker (matching /#[A-Za-z0-9_-]/) is specified by attaching a comment containing the marker to the line at which the diagnostic is expected, and then can be referenced from an expected-* directive after an @: foo // #1 // expected-error@#1 {{undeclared identifier 'foo'}} The intent is for markers to be used in situations where relative line numbers are currently used, to avoid the need to renumber when the test case is rearranged. llvm-svn: 358326

Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code. Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840 llvm-svn: 359855

Summary: First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209 The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct. The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value. The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.) So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`. LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info. ``` Process 1056 stopped * thread #1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp() JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp: -> 0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>: pushq %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>: movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000 0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80 ``` [1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then. [2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110 Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova Reviewed By: labath, clayborg Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611 llvm-svn: 360354

This is the first in a set of patches I have to improve testing of llvm-objdump. This patch targets --all-headers, --section, and --full-contents. In the --section case, it deletes a pre-canned binary which is only used by the one test and replaces it with yaml. Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941 llvm-svn: 360893

Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code. Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840 llvm-svn: 359855

Summary: First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209 The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct. The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value. The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.) So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`. LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info. ``` Process 1056 stopped * thread intel#1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp() JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp: -> 0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>: pushq %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>: movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000 0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80 ``` [1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then. [2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110 Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova Reviewed By: labath, clayborg Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611 llvm-svn: 360354

Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code. Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840 llvm-svn: 359855

Summary: First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209 The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct. The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value. The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.) So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`. LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info. ``` Process 1056 stopped * thread intel#1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp() JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp: -> 0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>: pushq %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp 0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>: movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000 0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80 ``` [1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then. [2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110 Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova Reviewed By: labath, clayborg Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611 llvm-svn: 360354

This is the first in a set of patches I have to improve testing of llvm-objdump. This patch targets --all-headers, --section, and --full-contents. In the --section case, it deletes a pre-canned binary which is only used by the one test and replaces it with yaml. Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941 llvm-svn: 360893

@foo

Syntax: asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate : : InputOperands : Clobbers : GotoLabels) https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm For: asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop); IR: callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1 to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3 asm.fallthrough: Compiler need to generate: 1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label. 2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number". Diagnostic 1> duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label. 2> goto out of scope. llvm-svn: 362045

Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast. I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to unblock buildbot. ==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8 READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0 #0 0x436434f in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet, 8u> const&) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11 #1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3 #2 0x434042d in llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7 #3 0x433eb90 in llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5 #4 0x428b7ea in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13 #5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27 #6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16 #7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27 #8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865 #9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8 #10 0xa4270f in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22 #11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #12 0x971b69 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69) llvm-svn: 363105

Enable execution on GPU and ACC

f321c0f

vladimirlaz previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2019

View reviewed changes

Update kernel-and-program.cpp

d7439d1

lazvlaale dismissed vladimirlaz’s stale review via d7439d1 January 24, 2019 06:43

vladimirlaz closed this Jan 30, 2019

bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2019

Attempt to fix buildbot after r354972 [#1]. NFCI.

d89d638

llvm-svn: 355013

This was referenced Apr 9, 2019

[SYCL] Clang Driver ICE when no input file found #70

Closed

[SYCL] noexcept specifier device side ICE in LLVM-SPIRV #77

Closed

changbozhu mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2022

[SYCL] error: variable-sized object may not be initialized #887

Closed

e404044 mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2022

CUDA Supported, but no CPU Support #6686

Closed

etiotto mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2022

[SYCL-MLIR][RODINIA]: Rodinia performance benchmarks for SYCL #7641

Open

rdeodhar mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2023

[SYC] [L0] Enhance interop queue interface to choose standard or immediate commandlists #7196

Merged

whitneywhtsang mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2023

[SYCL-MLIR] Add sycl.accessor.get_pointer #8703

Merged

This was referenced Apr 12, 2022

SYCL :: Basic/interop/check_carrying_real_kernel_IDs.cpp fails sporadically #8802

Closed

Track all customizations that are made in llvm-spirv in intel/llvm #7592

Open

drhaozhong mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2023

A crash when compiling #8963

Closed

MaxwellDupre mentioned this pull request May 6, 2023

Compile fail in sycl_span.hpp 150 42 error: SIZE_MAX not declared #9348

Closed

erichkeane mentioned this pull request May 23, 2023

[SYCL] Do not diagnose undefined pure virtual functions #9394

Closed

LU-JOHN mentioned this pull request Aug 4, 2023

[NFC][OpaquePtrs] Update SYCLLowerIR tests to use opaque pointers #10687

Merged

jessicadavies-intel mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2023

[SYCL] Implement USM allocation functions with properties #10235

Merged

dkhaldi mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023

Failure in SYCL Pre Commit on Linux / test on AMD/HIP #11405

Closed

zahiraam mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2023

[SYCL-WEB][SYCL] Update function-attrs for sycl branch #11569

Merged

artemrad mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2023

[SYCL][Doc] Rename scope-specific variables #11166

Merged

wangzy0327 mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2024

Is there any documentation on address mapping to help developers use it? #13159

Open

againull mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2024

[CUDA][E2E] Graph/Update/RecordReplay/whole_update_double_buffer.cpp failed on SYCL Nightly #13420

Closed

jsji mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2024

Assertion `isValid(Attr)' for newly added RuntimeAligned.spt #14427

Closed

bader mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2024

forward_progress_kernel_param_L0_gpu.cpp fails in post-commit #14692

Open

aarongreig mentioned this pull request Aug 16, 2024

[SYCL][Doc] Update docs to reflect PI removal. #15057

Merged

MajidAbdelilah mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024

Native API failed. Native API returns: -999 (Unknown PI error) -999 (Unknown PI error) #15203

Closed

premanandrao mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024

[SYCL] Add support for -foffload-fp32-prec-div/sqrt options. #15836

Merged

kaanolgu mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2024

MultiGPU malloc_device fails for second GPU (Out of Memory) #16038

Closed

jinz2014 mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2025

Verification results differ across vendors' GPUs #16636

Open

PiFtch mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025

"no matrix hardware on the target device, joint_matrix is not supported" on Arc 130V #16851

Closed

lbushi25 mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2025

clang/test/CodeGenSYCL/debug-info-srcpos-kernel.cpp failing with latest compiler. #17964

Closed

izelnakri mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2025

[BUG] Can't compile sycl branch on NixOS, 1st class support to NixOS / nixpkgs please! #19347

Closed

dklochkov-emb mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025

[SYCL] Store string copy instead of view #20154

Closed

jsji mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2025

[HIP] amdgpu_unsafe_atomics failing in pulldown https://github.com/intel/llvm/pull/20373 #20465

Open

mavrogato mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2025

clang-22 asserts/crashes when compiling C++20 coroutines in device code #20661

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Enable execution on GPU and ACC#1

Enable execution on GPU and ACC#1
lazvlaale wants to merge 2 commits intointel:syclfrom
lazvlaale:patch-1

lazvlaale commented Jan 23, 2019 •

edited by vladimirlaz

Loading

Uh oh!

bader commented Jan 23, 2019

Uh oh!

vladimirlaz commented Jan 23, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

lazvlaale commented Jan 23, 2019 • edited by vladimirlaz Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bader commented Jan 23, 2019

Uh oh!

vladimirlaz commented Jan 23, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

lazvlaale commented Jan 23, 2019 •

edited by vladimirlaz

Loading