Skip to content

repo webhook url is sensitive#540

Merged
jcudit merged 2 commits intointegrations:masterfrom
kzw:master
Nov 5, 2020
Merged

repo webhook url is sensitive#540
jcudit merged 2 commits intointegrations:masterfrom
kzw:master

Conversation

@kzw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kzw kzw commented Aug 27, 2020

This marks URL of repo webhook as sensitive. A use case is for atlantis server where URL contains basic auth credentials.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@majormoses majormoses left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

It might be good to update the docs to indicate why this is sensitive as that may not be obvious if you are not thinking about embedding credentials into the URL and are relying on other mechanisms such as verifying the signature of the payloads from github. I am not disagreeing on the validity of using auth to establish an additional entry point into say an auth proxy, just that we should document it's rationale.

@ghost ghost added the Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 17, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@majormoses majormoses left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jcudit jcudit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

@jcudit jcudit merged commit bfca206 into integrations:master Nov 5, 2020
kfcampbell pushed a commit to kfcampbell/terraform-provider-github that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
* repo webhook url is sensitive

* document the reason for marking url sensitive

Co-authored-by: kzw <kzw@noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants