Minor change about ARCHIVE_LIST for TF Data2Vec#17085
Merged
ydshieh merged 1 commit intohuggingface:mainfrom May 4, 2022
Merged
Minor change about ARCHIVE_LIST for TF Data2Vec#17085ydshieh merged 1 commit intohuggingface:mainfrom
ydshieh merged 1 commit intohuggingface:mainfrom
Conversation
|
The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged. |
sgugger
approved these changes
May 4, 2022
Collaborator
sgugger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok for now for consistency between models.
elusenji
pushed a commit
to elusenji/transformers
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2022
Co-authored-by: ydshieh <ydshieh@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Just not to declare
DATA2VEC_VISION_PRETRAINED_MODEL_ARCHIVE_LISTin TF test file.But I don't mean to introduce it in the model (it was there already in that PR).
As we discussed before, it's better to just drop this variable, and use the checkpoint name directly in
test_model_from_pretrained. I can change to that, just let me know :-)