feat: add recent history in search#9453
Conversation
|
|
@Vadman97 please review |
Vadman97
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks for taking this on, @rajeshj11 ! have some quick initial feedback: https://www.loom.com/share/52f227c9c6ef45049908bcbca3e26681
@julian-highlight , would you be able to review the styles? here's the reflame preview
thanks for your feedback will work on it and update you |
|
@Vadman97 Worked on the feedback changes. please review |
…ight into feat-8785-recent-history
|
@Vadman97 Can you please review |
|
@Vadman97 Following up on the review |
|
@Vadman97 Sorry for following up too many times. please let me know if it needs any changes. |
|
@Vadman97 Updated please check |
|
@Vadman97 Can you please review the latest changes |
Vadman97
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just one more UX improvement request: https://www.loom.com/share/f3d046d53f764dfabf6080f8e4f6cf78
| comboboxStore.setActiveId(null) | ||
| comboboxStore.setState('moves', 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry for all the back-and-forth, this should be the last feedback point
https://www.loom.com/share/f3d046d53f764dfabf6080f8e4f6cf78
|
@Vadman97 Updated the pr. please check |
Vadman97
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
new behavior looks good, just a new rendering bug
|
looks great! merging shortly |
## Summary <!-- Ideally, there is an attached GitHub issue that will describe the "why". If relevant, use this section to call out any additional information you'd like to _highlight_ to the reviewer. --> closes highlight#8785 /claim highlight#8785 ## How did you test this change? <!-- Frontend - Leave a screencast or a screenshot to visually describe the changes. --> ## Are there any deployment considerations? <!-- Backend - Do we need to consider migrations or backfilling data? --> ## Does this work require review from our design team? <!-- Request review from julian-highlight / our design team --> --------- Co-authored-by: Rajesh Jonnalagadda <38752904+rajeshj11@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
closes #8785
/claim #8785
How did you test this change?
Are there any deployment considerations?
Does this work require review from our design team?