Coverage decreased (-0.0008%) to 97.282% when pulling 6c1bfcc on seaoak:bugfix/keep_blank_lines_in_backtick_code_block_on_blockquote into 9662366 on hexojs:master.

I appreciate the effort, my apology if my comment was misunderstood, I intended it to the Markdown beginners.

The reason being this PR is not consistent with GFM, which also doesn't keep blank lines; i.e. <br/> is required to add new lines. I personally prefer to be consistent with GFM. I'm guessing there might be instance where user add a blank line > simply for readability (of the source md file), but doesn't actually want new line.

Following is demo of GFM behavior:

> This is a code-block
> 
> ```json
> {
>   "test": 123
> }
> ```
>
>
> This is a following paragraph

rendered as,

This is a code-block

{
  "test": 123
}

This is a following paragraph

> This is a code-block
> 
> ```json
> {
>   "test": 123
> }
> ```
> <br/>
> <br/>
> This is a following paragraph

rendered as

This is a code-block

{
  "test": 123
}

This is a following paragraph

I tested the previous PR #3768, it is consistent with GFM.

@curbengh My understanding that blank lines out of a code block are meaningless in GFM.
This PR is for a blank line IN a code block.

I think a blank line in a code block shuold be kept even if it is in blockquote.

For example, the followings contains two blank line
and I can preview them as it is.

aaa


bbb

This PR is for a blank line IN a code block.

aaa


bbb

The example makes it clearer to me. I just tested this PR, now it's more consistent with GFM.

@curbengh Thank you to review and test! 😄
Your comments are very helpful to clarify this PR and my understanding.