feat: [#463] The validation module supports custom filter#589
feat: [#463] The validation module supports custom filter#589krishankumar01 merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the validation module by introducing a command for creating custom filters, improving developer productivity. A new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #589 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.06% 70.05% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 181 182 +1
Lines 11234 11288 +54
==========================================
+ Hits 7871 7908 +37
- Misses 2789 2805 +16
- Partials 574 575 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (r Stubs) Request() string { | ||
| func (r Stubs) Rule() string { |
validation/console/stubs.go
Outdated
| return "DummyName" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Handle The filter function to apply. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it better to add the detailed description here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, we should include
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seem many repeat codes in the make commands, we need to reconstruct it in a suitable time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should I do it in this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- validation/console/filter_make_command.go (1 hunks)
- validation/console/filter_make_command_test.go (1 hunks)
- validation/console/rule_make_command.go (1 hunks)
- validation/console/stubs.go (2 hunks)
- validation/service_provider.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
validation/service_provider.go (1)
27-27: LGTM! The new command registration is appropriate.The addition of
FilterMakeCommandenhances the functionality by allowing the creation of custom filters.validation/console/filter_make_command_test.go (1)
16-43: Comprehensive test coverage forFilterMakeCommand.The tests effectively cover different scenarios, ensuring robust functionality.
validation/console/stubs.go (2)
Line range hint
6-31:
RenamingRequesttoRuleis appropriate.The change reflects a more specific focus on rule-based operations.
33-78: TheFiltermethod is well-documented and enhances functionality.The detailed comments provide clear guidance on implementing custom filters.
validation/console/rule_make_command.go (1)
61-61: Verify the impact of the stub change.The
getStubmethod now returnsStubs{}.Rule()instead ofStubs{}.Request(). Ensure that this change aligns with the intended functionality and verify its impact on the system.validation/console/filter_make_command.go (1)
1-101: New command for filter creation looks good.The
FilterMakeCommandintroduces a new command for creating filter classes, consistent with the existing command patterns. Ensure that it integrates well with the overall system and verify its functionality.Verification successful
FilterMakeCommand is well integrated and tested.
The
FilterMakeCommandis registered invalidation/service_provider.goand has corresponding tests invalidation/console/filter_make_command_test.go, indicating proper integration and functionality verification.
validation/service_provider.go: RegistersFilterMakeCommand.validation/console/filter_make_command_test.go: Contains tests forFilterMakeCommand.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and functionality of the `FilterMakeCommand`. # Test: Search for the `FilterMakeCommand` usage and ensure it is correctly integrated. rg --type go -A 5 $'FilterMakeCommand'Length of output: 4671
go.mod (1)
110-110: Verify compatibility of the updated dependency.The
github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2package has been updated fromv2.2.5tov2.2.7. Ensure compatibility and check for any breaking changes or new features.Verification successful
Compatibility Verified for
github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2UpdateThe update from
v2.2.5tov2.2.7includes enhancements such as new feature detections for AMD and Intel processors, workflow updates, and documentation changes. No breaking changes were identified. Please review the new features to ensure they align with your codebase requirements.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the compatibility of the updated `cpuid` dependency. # Test: Check the changelog or release notes for `v2.2.7` to identify any breaking changes or new features. # Note: This is a placeholder for manual verification, as changelogs are not accessible via shell scripts. echo "Please manually verify the changelog for github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2 v2.2.7"Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the commit history for the cpuid repository between v2.2.5 and v2.2.7 # to identify any changes that might affect compatibility. # Clone the repository to a temporary directory git clone --quiet https://github.com/klauspost/cpuid.git cpuid_repo # Navigate into the repository cd cpuid_repo # Fetch the commit log between the specified tags git log v2.2.5..v2.2.7 --oneline # Clean up by removing the cloned repository cd .. rm -rf cpuid_repoLength of output: 535
📑 Description
Closes goravel/goravel#463
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
--forceflag for overwriting existing filters.Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation
Stubstype to clarify new functionalities related to rules and filters.✅ Checks