[v2] fix (image/v2/images): image v2 unmarshal issue#3590
Merged
Conversation
kayrus
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2025
|
Failed to backport PR to |
|
@kayrus backport failed. Just a reminder. |
This was referenced Dec 22, 2025
Closed
Contributor
@Pjack This PR was submitted against the |
mandre
added a commit
to shiftstack/gophercloud
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2025
As seen in [1], we shouldn't add the `backport-v2` label to PRs that are already submitted against `v2` branch. [1] gophercloud#3590 (comment)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport: #3589
This PR address the unmarshal issue when user add an additional property
propertiesto the image usingopenstack image set <IMAGE> --property <KEY>=<VALUE> ..., which collides with the field inImage.Propertieswith a type ofmap[string]any.Fixes #3588
See the issue above to reproduce a test case.