test(source/postgres): fix list_database_stats integration test#2196
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @srividyareddy786, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a known flakiness issue in the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a flaky integration test, list_database_stats, by replacing hardcoded database and user names with randomly generated ones using UUIDs. This is a good approach to prevent conflicts when tests are run in parallel. The implementation is correct, but there's an opportunity to improve code readability and reduce repetition. I've added a specific suggestion for this.
362fd08 to
888fd49
Compare
…st (googleapis#2196) ## Description > Should include a concise description of the changes (bug or feature), it's > impact, along with a summary of the solution The list_database_stats test is flaky when run in parallel on the same shared instance. It fails with the error: failed to create test_user1: ERROR: role "test_user1" already exists. This test is updates to create a random role and database name to avoid conflicts with other simultaneously running tests. ## PR Checklist > Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a > few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [x] Make sure you reviewed [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [x] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) - [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change 🛠️ Fixes #<1738> 3fe4e2b
…st (googleapis#2196) ## Description > Should include a concise description of the changes (bug or feature), it's > impact, along with a summary of the solution The list_database_stats test is flaky when run in parallel on the same shared instance. It fails with the error: failed to create test_user1: ERROR: role "test_user1" already exists. This test is updates to create a random role and database name to avoid conflicts with other simultaneously running tests. ## PR Checklist > Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a > few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [x] Make sure you reviewed [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [x] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) - [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change 🛠️ Fixes #<1738> 3fe4e2b
…leapis#2196) ## Description > Should include a concise description of the changes (bug or feature), it's > impact, along with a summary of the solution The list_database_stats test is flaky when run in parallel on the same shared instance. It fails with the error: failed to create test_user1: ERROR: role "test_user1" already exists. This test is updates to create a random role and database name to avoid conflicts with other simultaneously running tests. ## PR Checklist > Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a > few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [x] Make sure you reviewed [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [x] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) - [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change 🛠️ Fixes #<1738>
Description
The list_database_stats test is flaky when run in parallel on the same shared instance. It fails with the error: failed to create test_user1: ERROR: role "test_user1" already exists. This test is updates to create a random role and database name to avoid conflicts with other simultaneously running tests.
PR Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.md
bug/issue
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
!if this involve a breaking change🛠️ Fixes #<1738>