Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2026. It is now read-only.

chore: release 1.7.1-SNAPSHOT#719

Merged
stephaniewang526 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-v1.7.1-SNAPSHOT
Dec 10, 2020
Merged

chore: release 1.7.1-SNAPSHOT#719
stephaniewang526 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-v1.7.1-SNAPSHOT

Conversation

@release-please
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*

Updating meta-information for bleeding-edge SNAPSHOT release.


This PR was generated with Release Please.

@release-please release-please bot requested review from a team and pmakani December 10, 2020 02:38
@release-please release-please bot added the type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like. label Dec 10, 2020
@generated-files-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning: This pull request is touching the following templated files:

  • samples/snapshot/pom.xml

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. label Dec 10, 2020
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Dec 10, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yoshi-approver yoshi-approver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rubber stamped release!

@yoshi-approver yoshi-approver added automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. labels Dec 10, 2020
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Dec 10, 2020
@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 10, 2020
@stephaniewang526
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yirutang full stacktrace

java.lang.AssertionError
	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:87)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:42)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:53)
	at com.google.cloud.bigquery.storage.v1alpha2.JsonStreamWriterTest.testMultiThreadAppendNoSchemaUpdate(JsonStreamWriterTest.java:808)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:55)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:157)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:428)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:562)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:548)

This test seems flaky - could you take a look please?

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #719 (61a2f04) into master (ace8a95) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #719      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     80.37%   80.40%   +0.03%     
  Complexity      957      957              
============================================
  Files            73       73              
  Lines          5334     5334              
  Branches        405      405              
============================================
+ Hits           4287     4289       +2     
+ Misses          878      877       -1     
+ Partials        169      168       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...e/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/StreamWriter.java 85.43% <0.00%> (+0.44%) 37.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ace8a95...61a2f04. Read the comment docs.

@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 merged commit f4de72c into master Dec 10, 2020
@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 deleted the release-v1.7.1-SNAPSHOT branch December 10, 2020 22:26
shubhwip pushed a commit to shubhwip/java-bigquerystorage that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Replace manual attempt at caching via a HashMap with a guava Cache.

Fix googleapis#691
Fix googleapis#698
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants