Skip to content

Conversation

@lqiu96
Copy link
Member

@lqiu96 lqiu96 commented Dec 12, 2025

No description provided.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: l Pull request size is large. api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. labels Dec 12, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @lqiu96, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the maintainability and clarity of the test suite by addressing various warnings reported by IntelliJ IDEA. The changes primarily involve standardizing assertion methods, improving floating-point comparisons, and making minor code style adjustments to align with best practices, ensuring cleaner and more robust test code.

Highlights

  • Standardized JUnit Assertions: Reordered arguments in numerous assertEquals calls to consistently place the expected value before the actual value, aligning with the assertEquals(expected, actual) convention. Additionally, replaced generic assertEquals(null, ...) and assertEquals(false, ...) with assertNull(...) and assertFalse(...) respectively, and assertEquals(true, ...) with assertTrue(...).
  • Improved Double Comparisons: Updated floating-point comparisons from assertTrue(double1 == double2) to use assertEquals(expected, actual, delta) for more accurate floating-point comparisons, accounting for precision issues.
  • Minor Code Refinements: Addressed various minor code style and best practice warnings, such as changing Boolean found = false; to boolean found = false;, removing a debug System.out.println statement, and simplifying string initializations.
  • OpenTelemetry Test Refactoring: Adjusted OpenTelemetry tracing test setup in testLocation by introducing a dedicated otelBigquery variable and removing redundant tracing cleanup from the finally block, streamlining the test logic.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request cleans up several test warnings and improves test code quality. The changes include using more specific assertion methods (e.g., assertTrue, assertNull), correcting the order of arguments in assertEquals, removing System.out.println calls, and improving test isolation. These are all positive changes. I have one suggestion regarding floating-point comparisons where a non-zero delta should be used for assertEquals to avoid potential flakiness.

@lqiu96 lqiu96 marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 19:47
@lqiu96 lqiu96 requested review from a team as code owners December 12, 2025 19:47
@lqiu96 lqiu96 requested review from jinseopkim0 and logachev and removed request for logachev December 12, 2025 19:47
@lqiu96 lqiu96 merged commit c161364 into main Dec 12, 2025
24 checks passed
@lqiu96 lqiu96 deleted the cleanup-test-resources branch December 12, 2025 20:14
diegomarquezp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
* chore: Cleanup initialized resources

* chore: Use try-with to close stream

* chore: Cleanup Intellij test warnings

* chore: Allow for floating point inaccuracies

* chore: Add otel delete operation
diegomarquezp added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
* chore: sync with last release from main branch

* feat: Introduce DataFormatOptions to configure the output of BigQuery data types (#4010)

* feat: Create DataFormatOptions in BigQuery

* feat: Add Builder class for DataFormatOptions

* fix: Update existing references of useInt64Timestamp to use DataFormatOption's variant

* chore: Fix lint issues

* chore: Address PR feedback

* chore: Add tests for useInt64Timestamp behavior

* chore: Address failing tests and GCA

* chore: Remove unused fromPb method

* feat: Add timestamp_precision to Field (#4014)

* feat: Add timestamp_precision to Field

* Apply suggestion from @gemini-code-assist[bot]

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: Address GCA PR feedback

* chore: Fix typo

* chore: Remove default value

* chore: Address PR feedback

---------

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: Use custom timestamp validator for ISO8601 timestamps with more than nanosecond precision (#4017)

* chore: Use custom timestamp validator for ISO8601 timestamps with more than nanosecond precision

* chore: Rename helper method to validateTimestamp

* chore: Address GCA comments

* chore: Address last GCA comment

* chore: Update to use assert helper method

* test: Clean up resources created in ITs (#4024)

* chore: Cleanup initialized resources

* chore: Delete created dataset

* chore: Use try-with to close stream

* chore: Cleanup Intellij test warnings (#4026)

* chore: Cleanup initialized resources

* chore: Use try-with to close stream

* chore: Cleanup Intellij test warnings

* chore: Allow for floating point inaccuracies

* chore: Add otel delete operation

* deps: update actions/upload-artifact action to v6 (#4027)

Co-authored-by: Blake Li <blakeli@google.com>

* chore: Use assertThrows in tests (#4028)

* chore: Cleanup initialized resources

* chore: Use try-with to close stream

* chore: Cleanup Intellij test warnings

* chore: Allow for floating point inaccuracies

* chore: Add otel delete operation

* chore: Clean up rest of the IT test file

* chore: Add GCA feedback

* chore: Update renovate.json (#4031)

deps update from bigquerystorage was incorrectly marked as chore(deps). This would cause the upgrade not show up in the release notes and also not trigger release please.

This is because the pattern /^com.google.cloud:google-cloud-bigquery is configured in renovate.json, which matches both bigquery and bigquerystorage. However, I believe the original intention is only for bigquery update in samples, not for bigquerystorage update.

Fixing the pattern so that the String must ends with bigquery

* chore(main): release 2.57.2-SNAPSHOT (#4032)

Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: fix unresolved conflicts

---------

Co-authored-by: Lawrence Qiu <lawrenceqiu@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mend Renovate <bot@renovateapp.com>
Co-authored-by: Blake Li <blakeli@google.com>
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. size: l Pull request size is large.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants