-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Add support for new api features in BigQuery TimePartitioning. #3158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The two features are requirePartitionFilter & field. Also this moves to using a builder instead of using more `of` methods since the number of combinations is large.
pongad
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for the PR!
@tswast please also take a look.
| /** | ||
| * A builder for {@code TimePartitioning} objects. | ||
| */ | ||
| public abstract static class Builder { |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| * If not set, the table is partitioned by pseudo column '_PARTITIONTIME'; if set, the table is | ||
| * partitioned by this field. | ||
| */ | ||
| public String getField() { |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thank you for the PR! LGTM but @tswast should sign off. |
tswast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wonderful. Thanks a bunch.
* chore(main): release 3.19.1 * chore: generate libraries at Thu Jan 15 15:36:07 UTC 2026 --------- Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: cloud-java-bot <cloud-java-bot@google.com>
The two features are requirePartitionFilter & field.
Also this moves to using a builder instead of using more
ofmethods since the number of combinations is large.