BigQuery: add maximumBillingTier option#2044
Conversation
Allow to pass the optional maximumBillingTier parameter (fixes googleapis#2012)
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Return the optional billing tier limit for this job. | ||
| */ |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Limit the billing tier for this job. Queries that have resource usage beyond this tier will fail |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| return useLegacySql; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Changes Unknown when pulling f8717e7 on rborer:bigquery-billing-tier into ** on GoogleCloudPlatform:master**. |
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Returns the optional billing tier limit for this job. | ||
| */ |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Changes Unknown when pulling c2aa3c7 on rborer:bigquery-billing-tier into ** on GoogleCloudPlatform:master**. |
| .add("writeDisposition", writeDisposition) | ||
| .add("dryRun", dryRun) | ||
| .add("useLegacySql", useLegacySql) | ||
| .add("maximumBillingTier", maximumBillingTier) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Changes Unknown when pulling 7304dee on rborer:bigquery-billing-tier into ** on GoogleCloudPlatform:master**. |
|
LGTM |
|
Any chance of getting this merged and rolled out? It's a real headache for us having to use the old lib just because this method is not exposed in the new one. |
|
This is merged now. It should go out in the next release in the next few business days. |
…v3.56.1 (#2044) Co-authored-by: Jin Seop Kim <jinseop@google.com>
…v3.56.1 (#2044) Co-authored-by: Jin Seop Kim <jinseop@google.com>
…27.0 (#2044) * deps: update dependency com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util to v4.27.0 * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md --------- Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.129.7](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/compare/v1.129.6...v1.129.7) (2024-05-29) ### Dependencies * Change scope of grpc-inprocess dependency from runtime to test ([#2038](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/issues/2038)) ([1ab45c9](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/commit/1ab45c9eaee35d4bfeb332244c74f1253b77c166)) * Update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-bigquery to v2.40.2 ([#2046](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/issues/2046)) ([f81c5e1](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/commit/f81c5e1b977e6da19aac6a40c1389ddcc4643e3c)) * Update dependency com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util to v4.27.0 ([#2044](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/issues/2044)) ([37e94ce](https://togithub.com/googleapis/java-pubsub/commit/37e94ce13a2998b5e3f69e9ad3d4ab68af108d64)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://togithub.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://togithub.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Allow to pass the optional maximumBillingTier parameter (fixes #2012).