Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the UI testing suite by consolidating many small, individual test files into a few larger, more organized files. This change is facilitated by the adoption of Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3001 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.87% 91.87%
=======================================
Files 20 20
Lines 6057 6057
=======================================
Hits 5565 5565
Misses 492 492 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a nice refactoring that coalesces many small UI test files into a few larger ones, which should improve maintainability. The changes are mostly good, but I've found a couple of issues.
There's a critical issue in tests/ui/try_transmute_mut.rs where two test functions are broken due to missing type definitions and incorrect macro usage, causing compilation failures. I've suggested removing or fixing them.
I also found a minor issue in tests/ui/transmute_mut.rs with an unused import that should be removed for code cleanliness. Other than these points, the refactoring looks solid.
19fec81 to
651635f
Compare
eb4b425 to
f33f472
Compare
651635f to
2400630
Compare
Now that we're using ui-test's inline annotations, it is not risky to coalesce many tests in a single file. Makes progress on #2999 gherrit-pr-id: G25fee321cbc44905c61a0065546e8d58bfaff20f
2400630 to
2e21863
Compare
Now that we're using ui-test's inline annotations, it is not risky to
coalesce many tests in a single file.
Makes progress on #2999
Latest Update: v4 — Compare vs v3
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.
⬇️ Download this PR
Branch
git fetch origin refs/heads/G25fee321cbc44905c61a0065546e8d58bfaff20f && git checkout -b pr-G25fee321cbc44905c61a0065546e8d58bfaff20f FETCH_HEADCheckout
git fetch origin refs/heads/G25fee321cbc44905c61a0065546e8d58bfaff20f && git checkout FETCH_HEADCherry Pick
git fetch origin refs/heads/G25fee321cbc44905c61a0065546e8d58bfaff20f && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEADPull
Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.