docs: add RoutePatternMatch documentation#3722
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughAdds documentation for the public RoutePatternMatch API in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive documentation for the RoutePatternMatch utility function. The changes improve the function's inline documentation and provide user-facing documentation with examples in the utils guide.
- Expanded the function comment to describe pattern syntax and configuration options
- Added detailed documentation to the utils guide with signature and usage examples
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| path.go | Enhanced inline documentation for RoutePatternMatch function |
| docs/guide/utils.md | Added new section documenting RoutePatternMatch with examples |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on improving the clarity and completeness of the documentation for the RoutePatternMatch utility. The changes aim to make it easier for developers to understand how to use this function, its pattern syntax, and configuration options, both within the code and in the user guide.
Highlights
- Documentation Expansion: Expanded the documentation for RoutePatternMatch in docs/guide/utils.md to include its purpose, signature, and practical examples of its usage.
- GoDoc Improvement: Enhanced the GoDoc comment for the RoutePatternMatch function in path.go to provide a more detailed explanation of its pattern syntax, configuration options, and overall utility.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances the documentation for the RoutePatternMatch utility function. The function-level comment in path.go has been expanded with more details about pattern syntax and configuration, which is a great improvement. The documentation in docs/guide/utils.md has a new section for RoutePatternMatch, which is also good. I have one suggestion to make the examples in the guide more comprehensive by including wildcards and optional segments, as mentioned in the description.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3722 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.08% 92.05% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 11535 11535
==========================================
- Hits 10622 10619 -3
- Misses 662 664 +2
- Partials 251 252 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/guide/utils.md (2)
120-126: Clarify defaults and normalization in the description
Briefly call out defaults (CaseSensitive=false, StrictRouting=false) and that patterns are normalized to start with “/”. Keeps docs self-contained and aligned with implementation.-Checks whether a given path matches a Fiber route pattern. Useful for testing -patterns without registering them. Patterns may contain parameters, wildcards -and optional segments. An optional `Config` allows control over case sensitivity -and strict routing. +Checks whether a given path matches a Fiber route pattern. Useful for testing +patterns without registering them. Patterns may contain parameters, wildcards, +and optional segments. By default CaseSensitive=false and StrictRouting=false. +Patterns not starting with "/" are normalized to start with "/". An optional +`Config` allows control over case sensitivity and strict routing.
131-139: Add trailing-slash/StrictRouting example
A quick example prevents confusion around default StrictRouting=false behavior.fiber.RoutePatternMatch( "/User/john", "/user/:name", fiber.Config{CaseSensitive: true}, ) // false + +// Trailing slash handling (StrictRouting=false by default) +fiber.RoutePatternMatch("/user/", "/user") // true +fiber.RoutePatternMatch("/user/", "/user", fiber.Config{StrictRouting: true}) // false
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/guide/utils.md(1 hunks)path.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Review and update the contents of the
docsfolder if necessary when modifying code
Files:
docs/guide/utils.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ckoch786
PR: gofiber/fiber#3230
File: docs/whats_new.md:944-951
Timestamp: 2024-12-15T19:56:45.935Z
Learning: Detailed usage examples and explanations for new methods like `RemoveRoute` and `RemoveRouteByName` are documented in `docs/api/app.md`, so it's unnecessary to duplicate them in `docs/whats_new.md`.
📚 Learning: 2024-12-15T19:56:45.935Z
Learnt from: ckoch786
PR: gofiber/fiber#3230
File: docs/whats_new.md:944-951
Timestamp: 2024-12-15T19:56:45.935Z
Learning: Detailed usage examples and explanations for new methods like `RemoveRoute` and `RemoveRouteByName` are documented in `docs/api/app.md`, so it's unnecessary to duplicate them in `docs/whats_new.md`.
Applied to files:
docs/guide/utils.md
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
path.go
[failure] 133-133:
behaviour is a misspelling of behavior (misspell)
🪛 GitHub Actions: golangci-lint
path.go
[error] 133-133: golangci-lint: path.go:133:19: behaviour is a misspelling of behavior (misspell)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guide/utils.md
[grammar] ~124-~124: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ig` allows control over case sensitivity and strict routing. ```go title="Signat...
(QB_NEW_EN)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Compare
- GitHub Check: unit (1.25.x, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: unit (1.25.x, macos-13)
- GitHub Check: repeated
Summary
Testing
make audit(fails: lock value copy in generated msgp files)make generatemake betteralignmake modernizemake formatmake testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68b432762d5c8326a7859391f5d5ab6b