Skip to content

add reviewers related fields to MergeRequestEvent webhook event#916

Merged
jmini merged 4 commits into
gitlab4j:masterfrom
mifitous:add-missing-reviewers-to-MergeRequestEvent
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

add reviewers related fields to MergeRequestEvent webhook event#916
jmini merged 4 commits into
gitlab4j:masterfrom
mifitous:add-missing-reviewers-to-MergeRequestEvent

Conversation

@mifitous

@mifitous mifitous commented Feb 16, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR will add the missing reviewers fields to the MergeRequestEvent

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @jabby
Can you please review and trigger checks?
Merci beaucoup

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gmessner @tubbynl @krische @PhilippeVienne @lamdav
Hello dear gentlemen

Can someone of you please review it? It is blocking us from delivering another fix in a Jenkins plug-in

Sincerely,
@mifitous

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @bwaldvogel
Maybe you can review it please?

@tabilzad

Copy link
Copy Markdown

duplicate 879

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

duplicate 879

Hi @tabilzad
This one has passed all tests on my machine, so wondering if we can close #879 and ack this one please?

@tabilzad

tabilzad commented Feb 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mifitous Both PRs have identical file changes so the pipeline test failures cant be PR related. I'll let the maintainers decide, but it's obviously not a great practice to pollute the PR log with identical PRs just because older ones don't get maintainers' attention.

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mifitous Both PRs have identical file changes so the pipeline test failures cant be PR related. I'll let the maintainers decide, but it's obviously not a great practice to pollute the PR log with identical PRs just because older ones don't get maintainers' attention.

@tabilzad : I see #879 is opened for already more than 3 month, and no maintainer even reacted. I'm fine for having it either way, but it seems we may need to envisage adding more active maintainers to this repo...

@mifitous

mifitous commented Mar 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @jabby
Can you please review and trigger checks?
Merci beaucoup

@jmini

jmini commented Mar 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In my opinion the merge-request-event.json should be updated so that it has the new attribute reviewers.

Check "Payload example" in Merge request events

@jmini jmini left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the JSON file corresponding to this change should be updated as well.

@mifitous

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @jmini
Will have a look, Thank you

@mifitous mifitous force-pushed the add-missing-reviewers-to-MergeRequestEvent branch from 1fb0272 to e4d13ac Compare March 21, 2023 12:18
@mifitous

mifitous commented Apr 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think the JSON file corresponding to this change should be updated as well.

Hi @jmini
updated

@jmini

jmini commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I have updated the example JSON one more time, because it seems that we are not supporting all the fields you added (can be done in a follow up step)

@mifitous

mifitous commented Apr 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @jabby / @gmessner
Can you please trigger a new release to get this PR delivered? #945

@mifitous mifitous restored the add-missing-reviewers-to-MergeRequestEvent branch April 17, 2023 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants