[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Issues Report — 2026-04-05 #24631
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Auto-Triage Issues. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #24732. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Auto-Triage Report Summary
Report Period: 2026-04-05T01:04 UTC (Scheduled run — every 6 hours)
Issues Processed: 0
Labels Applied: 0 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 6 issues (integrity-blocked — cannot be read or labeled)
Key Metrics
no:labelsearch)Classification Summary
No issues were labeled this run. All 6 unlabeled issues are blocked by the integrity filter and cannot be read or processed by this agent.
Integrity Filter Details
The 6 unlabeled open issues are community-authored (author_association not in
MEMBER/OWNER/COLLABORATOR) and fall below the minimum integrity threshold configured for this workflow. This agent cannot read their titles or bodies, and therefore cannot classify or label them.View Technical Constraints
Why these issues are blocked:
The GitHub MCP tools in this workflow require a minimum integrity level of
approved(merged PRs or similarly vetted content). Community issues that have not been approved/triaged yet fall below this threshold.To allow labeling of these issues, the workflow would need to lower
min-integrityin its GitHub frontmatter:Label Distribution (Visible Issues)
View Label Statistics for Labeled Issues
From the ~100+ visible open issues, common label categories observed:
All visible open issues already have appropriate labels — no additional labeling was needed for the accessible issue set.
Recommendations
min-integrity: noneand threat detection enabled) could address the 6 remaining unlabeled community issues.Confidence Assessment
min-integrityin workflow configReferences:
Note
🔒 Integrity filter blocked 54 items
The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".list_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".search_issues: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".To allow these resources, lower
min-integrityin your GitHub frontmatter:Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions